2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An abdominal spacer that does not require surgical removal and allows drainage of abdominal fluids in patients undergoing carbon ion radiotherapy

Abstract: Abdominal spacers are useful for maintaining the distance between the target tumors and surrounding tissues, such as the gastrointestinal tract, in patients treated with carbon ion radiotherapy. Surgical intervention to remove the spacers is sometimes necessary because of abdominal infections triggered by long-term spacer placement or intestinal perforation. Therefore, spacers that do not require surgical removal and provide effective drainage against abdominal infections are urgently needed. This study aimed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following are some limitations and future considerations: (1) insert spacers using laparoscopy or robotic surgery, which is less invasive than open laparotomy; (2) perform a long-term follow-up for similar situations and investigate whether the nonabsorbable spacers, which have the risk of abdominal infection caused by residual foreign material or intestinal perforation caused by spacers’ rigidity or size associated with prolonged use 16 , are safe; and (3) assess whether the nonabsorbable spacers can be replaced with nonsurgically removable spacers under development 17 or bioresorbable spacers such as polyglycolic acid spacers (Neskeep; Alfresa Pharma Co, Osaka, Japan) used in carbon ion radiation therapy. 18 , 19 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following are some limitations and future considerations: (1) insert spacers using laparoscopy or robotic surgery, which is less invasive than open laparotomy; (2) perform a long-term follow-up for similar situations and investigate whether the nonabsorbable spacers, which have the risk of abdominal infection caused by residual foreign material or intestinal perforation caused by spacers’ rigidity or size associated with prolonged use 16 , are safe; and (3) assess whether the nonabsorbable spacers can be replaced with nonsurgically removable spacers under development 17 or bioresorbable spacers such as polyglycolic acid spacers (Neskeep; Alfresa Pharma Co, Osaka, Japan) used in carbon ion radiation therapy. 18 , 19 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%