2009
DOI: 10.1021/jp907921q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Ab Initio Force Field for Predicting Hydrogen Storage in IRMOF Materials

Abstract: An ab initio force field that describes interactions between hydrogen molecules and IRMOF materials is proposed. The force field parameters were derived by fitting to ab initio data that includes higher-order electron correction and extended basis-set effects and validated by calculating adsorption isotherms and isosteric heats of adsorption of H2 in IRMOF-1 using GCMC simulations performed at 77 and 298 K, in a broad range of pressure from 0.0 to 8.0 MPa. Excellent agreements with experimental data were obtai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
66
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
4
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance in hydrogen storage of the porous materials can also be forecasted by the radius ( r ) which is the distances between the center of the pore in materials and the nearest H atom. Bigger radius always related to smaller density, large percent pore volume, surface area per gram ( S S1 ), and also to large gravimetric H 2 adsorption . If we consider the VDW radius of H atom (1.20 Å), the diameters of them are 17.08, 30.24, 15.46, and 23.82 Å, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The performance in hydrogen storage of the porous materials can also be forecasted by the radius ( r ) which is the distances between the center of the pore in materials and the nearest H atom. Bigger radius always related to smaller density, large percent pore volume, surface area per gram ( S S1 ), and also to large gravimetric H 2 adsorption . If we consider the VDW radius of H atom (1.20 Å), the diameters of them are 17.08, 30.24, 15.46, and 23.82 Å, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We set both the equilibration and production steps up to 5 × 10 6 . The gravimetric H 2 adsorption percent and the volumetric H 2 adsorption capacity are calculated using the similar formula that mentioned by Fu and Sun . In this article, the excess adsorbed amounts ( N exc , in number.)…”
Section: Design Details and Computation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26,29,30 A different attempt has been made by trying to parameterise a Lennard-Jones force field for the MOF-H 2 interaction with data from ab initio MP2 calculations. 31,32 In a similar way, Matanovic et al 33 performed rigorous quantum calculations to study the H 2 binding in porous materials with state of the art accuracy and showed the intrinsic difficulties of the subsequent GCMC simulations in reproducing the potential energy surface.…”
Section: Force Field Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrogen stored in these reservoirs, nevertheless, suffers from technical limitations such as low net volumetric energy density in the case of CGH 2 and fuel-loss due to liquid hydrogen boil-off in the case of LH 2 [1e3]. Adsorptive hydrogen storage on microporous metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) is a potential alternative hydrogen storage approach which could overcome the above limitations of conventional hydrogen storage technologies [4,5]. However, unlike CGH 2 approach, adsorptive hydrogen storage approach requires the hydrogen stored in the adsorbent medium to be maintained at cryogenic temperatures for attaining high volumetric storage density [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%