1967
DOI: 10.1016/s0019-9958(67)90032-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An 8-state minimal time solution to the firing squad synchronization problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
82
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
82
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Few years after Goto's solution, Waksman [16] and Balzer [17] proposed optimal time solutions with 16 and 8 states, respectively.…”
Section: Known Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Few years after Goto's solution, Waksman [16] and Balzer [17] proposed optimal time solutions with 16 and 8 states, respectively.…”
Section: Known Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Balzer [17], and later Sanders [20], proved that there is no optimal time solution for 4 states able to synchronize all the lines for any n. Remark that there are solutions which synchronize lines of length 2 n but not lines of any length [21].…”
Section: Known Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We make the assumption that the border of this patch is synchronized, as done by a firing-squad-like algorithm (See [2] or [12]). This assumption is satisfied at the beginning of the computation, because this beginning in itself 315 trivially is a synchronizing event.…”
Section: Ongoing Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 C X C X C X C X ] t = 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 C C C C C C C C C 2 C X X X X X X X X 3 C X C C C C C C C 4 C X C X X X X X X 5 C X C X C C C C C 6 C X C X C X X X X 7 C X C X C X C C C 8 C X C X C X C X X 9 C X C X C X C X C 10 C X C X C X C X C 11 C X C X C X C X C 12 C X C X C X C X C 13 C X C X C X C X C t = 32 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 X X X X X X X X X 2 X X X X X X X X X 3 X X X X X X X X X 4 X X X X X X X X X 5 X X X X X X X X X 6 X X X X X X X X X 7 X X X X X X X X X 8 X X X X X X X X X 9 X X X X X X X X X 10 X X X X X X X X X 11 X X X X X X X X X 12 X X X X X X X X X 13 X X X X X X X X X t = 33 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Fig. 4.…”
Section: Zebra-like Mapping On Rectangle Arraysmentioning
confidence: 99%