2014
DOI: 10.1002/ana.24306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis onset is influenced by the burden of rare variants in known amyotrophic lateral sclerosis genes

Abstract: Objective To define the genetic landscape of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and assess the contribution of possible oligogenic inheritance, we aimed to comprehensively sequence 17 known ALS genes in 391 ALS patients from the United States. Methods Targeted pooled-sample sequencing was used to identify variants in 17 ALS genes. Fragment size analysis was used to define ATXN2 and C9ORF72 expansion sizes. Genotype-phenotype correlations were made with individual variants and total burden of variants. Rare … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

11
154
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
11
154
2
Order By: Relevance
“…22 In addition, there is direct evidence for an oligogenic basis of ALS, for example, 7 of 14 ALS patients with TARDBP variants carried variants in 4 other ALS genes sequenced, 23 and 15 of 391 (3.8%) ALS cases had variants in more than one of 17 analyzed ALS genes. 19 Our data provide evidence for a possible link between the motor neuron disease ALS and the hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy CMT4J at the genetic and phenotypic level, comparable to the detection of deleterious variants in the DYNC1H1 (dynein, cytoplasmic 1, heavy chain 1) gene previously associated with classical CMT, in patients with UMN syndromes. 24 Deleterious biallelic variants of FIG4 were initially identified in CMT4J, 9 which is an autosomal recessive form of CMT with severe combined axonal and demyelinating peripheral neuropathy and potentially severe muscle weakness and wasting.…”
Section: Fig4 Variants In a Centralsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…22 In addition, there is direct evidence for an oligogenic basis of ALS, for example, 7 of 14 ALS patients with TARDBP variants carried variants in 4 other ALS genes sequenced, 23 and 15 of 391 (3.8%) ALS cases had variants in more than one of 17 analyzed ALS genes. 19 Our data provide evidence for a possible link between the motor neuron disease ALS and the hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy CMT4J at the genetic and phenotypic level, comparable to the detection of deleterious variants in the DYNC1H1 (dynein, cytoplasmic 1, heavy chain 1) gene previously associated with classical CMT, in patients with UMN syndromes. 24 Deleterious biallelic variants of FIG4 were initially identified in CMT4J, 9 which is an autosomal recessive form of CMT with severe combined axonal and demyelinating peripheral neuropathy and potentially severe muscle weakness and wasting.…”
Section: Fig4 Variants In a Centralsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…6 Comparably, variants in FIG4 were identified as ALS risk factors in two recent large-scale sequencing studies. 19,22 However, there is incomplete penetrance in the ALS family described here, which includes an unaffected father carrying a FIG4 frameshift variant, suggesting that FIG4 variants are not causative alone, but that ALS patients may need to carry rare variants in multiple genes to show disease. This notion is corroborated by the finding that at least 30 genes are implicated in ALS pathogenesis with a low percentage of ALS cases explained by variants in each of these.…”
Section: Fig4 Variants In a Centralmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While most of the sporadic cases of the disorder do not have a known genetic basis, a majority of the familial forms have now been identified to have a genetic basis with mutations in several genes such as SOD1, TARDBP, FUS, and C9ORF72 [8]. Even in the absence of mutations, rare variants in these genes have been shown to be associated with both familial and sporadic forms of ALS [9]. These mutations typically cause protein aggregates and a gain-of-toxic function effect that lead to cell-specific degeneration [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%