2011
DOI: 10.1001/archneurol.2011.152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amyloid Imaging

William J. Jagust
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative sensitivities and specificities of the compounds for detecting and quantifying different levels of Aβ loads in human subjects remain an area of active investigation. 74,8587 …”
Section: F-labeled Aβ Imaging Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative sensitivities and specificities of the compounds for detecting and quantifying different levels of Aβ loads in human subjects remain an area of active investigation. 74,8587 …”
Section: F-labeled Aβ Imaging Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, participants from the 18 F-GTP1 and 18 F-PM-PBB3 cohorts were significantly younger compared to participants from the other cohorts. Compared to the MCI and AD dementia groups, CU Aβ+ participants were significantly older (F-stat=3.9, p<0.002) and had fewer males (F-stat=3, p<0.005).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…78 18 F -MK6240 AD Aβ+ scans from the AIBL cohort were visually were visually rated by two readers (CCR and NK), blind to participant characteristics, resulting in consensus visual reads, as previously described [31]. Briefly, scans were rated as i) tau negative (no tracer retention or minimal (unilateral or bilateral) entorhinal cortex retention; ii) limbic predominant (pronounced tracer retention in the MTL with no cortical retention); iii) hippocampal sparing (cortical tau tracer retention with no or minimal MTL signal); or iv) typical (MTL and cortical tracer retention).…”
Section: Visual Subtype Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations