2019
DOI: 10.1101/811505
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amygdalostriatal coupling underpins positive but not negative coloring of ambiguous affect

Abstract: AbstractHumans routinely integrate affective information from multiple sources. For example, we rarely interpret an emotional facial expression devoid of context. Here, we describe the neural correlates of an affective computation that involves integrating multiple sources, by leveraging the ambiguity and subtle feature-based valence signals found in surprised faces. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, participants reported the valence of surprised faces modulated by p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is supported by a meta-analysis study demonstrating an inverse relationship between positive affect and pain severity in people with chronic non-cancer pain. 63 We think that the NAc-amygdala network, which underpins positive emotional valence, 64 might play a role in buffering or facilitating clinical pain. However, how the dopaminergic neurotransmission through the reward circuitry influences migraine pain requires further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is supported by a meta-analysis study demonstrating an inverse relationship between positive affect and pain severity in people with chronic non-cancer pain. 63 We think that the NAc-amygdala network, which underpins positive emotional valence, 64 might play a role in buffering or facilitating clinical pain. However, how the dopaminergic neurotransmission through the reward circuitry influences migraine pain requires further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, since the task required a tripartite (positive/neutral/negative) categorization (Rosen et al, 2004;Fernandez-Duque and Black, 2005;Kipps et al, 2009), and considering the relatively low number of trials per emotion and the need guarantee adequate signal-to noise ratios for EEG data, different negative emotions (anger, disgust, fear, sadness) were not assessed individually. Moreover, the valence of 'surprise' may prove ambiguous, prompting both positive and negative interpretations (Kim et al, 2017;Petro et al, 2018;Kim et al, 2020b). Future tasks could tackle these shortcomings and provide more finegrained results for each emotion individually.…”
Section: Limitations and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SU was related to decreased VS-dmPFC connectivity for social rewards, potentially suggesting that increased SU is related to altered ability to process social information. Striatal connectivity has been linked to interpreting others’ facial expressions (Kim et al, 2020), and the dmPFC has been implicated in social cognitive functions during receipt of social feedback (e.g., Ferrari et al, 2016) and prediction error during social learning (Joiner et al, 2017; Suzuki et al, 2012). Reduced correspondence of the VS with dmPFC during social reward may suggest an impaired facility for assessing and reacting to feedback from others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%