2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.05.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amygdalar and hippocampal volume: A comparison between manual segmentation, Freesurfer and VBM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
48
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
6
48
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Thickness estimates have previously been found to be in agreement with manual measurements from MRI images [41, 42], as well as ex vivo tissue measurements [43, 44]. Subcortical volume estimates have also been found to correspond well with manual segmentation protocols, particularly in young adults [4552]. …”
Section: Study 1: Ccbdsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Thickness estimates have previously been found to be in agreement with manual measurements from MRI images [41, 42], as well as ex vivo tissue measurements [43, 44]. Subcortical volume estimates have also been found to correspond well with manual segmentation protocols, particularly in young adults [4552]. …”
Section: Study 1: Ccbdsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Note that, these studies used different segmentation techniques. One may argue that the technique might influence findings in case of adjacent structures such as the pallidum and putamen (36). Our current observations suggest that subcortical alterations in adult OCD may be limited to the pallidum and hippocampus rather than widespread.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some studies used voxel count methods to determine volume while others used ROI methods. These methods produce comparable, but heterogeneous results, [86] and more research is needed to make direct comparisons between these methods [87]. Without a meta-analysis, it is difficult to come to quantitative conclusions about findings in the literature, including determining whether gait parameters were differentially associated with different neuropathologies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%