2006
DOI: 10.1002/jqs.1037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AMS radiocarbon dating of Middle and Upper Palaeolithic bone in the British Isles: improved reliability using ultrafiltration

Abstract: Recent research at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (ORAU) has shown that ultrafiltration of gelatin from archaeological bone can, in many instances, remove low molecular weight contaminants. These can sometimes be of a different radiocarbon age and, unless removed, may severely influence results, particularly when dating bones greater than two to three half-lives of 14 C. In this study this methodology is applied to samples of Late Middle and Early Upper Palaeolithic age from the British Isles. In many… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
94
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
5
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this variation U. spelaeus closely parallels the range of isotopic values seen for modern European and North American brown bears (5,7,(28)(29)(30)) and the few data available for Late Pleistocene brown bears (10,42).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In this variation U. spelaeus closely parallels the range of isotopic values seen for modern European and North American brown bears (5,7,(28)(29)(30)) and the few data available for Late Pleistocene brown bears (10,42).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In two cases, the Arizona lab was able to obtain a determination on a specimen which had failed to yield sufficient carbon in the Oxford lab. In one of these cases (PO5-S1), this discrepancy is hard to explain, since both labs treated the specimen as burned bone (although it is well-known that burned bone is a difficult material to date accurately by the radiocarbon method; Jacobi et al, 2006) 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All measurements were made using the single aliquot regenerative-dose (SAR) procedure described elsewhere (e.g., Galbraith et al, 1999;Murray and Wintle, 2000;Jacobi et al, 2006). The SAR procedure involves measuring the OSL signals from the natural (burial) dose and from a series of regenerative doses (given in the laboratory by means of the calibrated 90 Sr/ 90 Y beta source), each of which was preheated at 260 C f or 10 s prior to optical stimulation by an intense, green (532 nm) laser beam for 2 s at 125 C. A fixed test dose (~11 Gy, preheated at 220 C for 5 s) was given after each natural and regenerative dose, and the induced OSL signals were used to correct for any sensitivity changes during the SAR sequence.…”
Section: Measurement Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%