1993
DOI: 10.1093/jhmas/48.4.454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amputation in the Civil War: Physical and Social Dimensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, with of the surviving wounded was likely to be amputees during the Civil War than during the Crimean War due to improvements in surgical survival rates. Estimates suggest amputation survival rates of roughly 75 percent during the U.S. Civil War (Figg and Farrell-Beck, 1993). During the years surrounding the Crimean War, by contrast, amputation survival rates among civilians treated in the relatively favorable conditions of the London Hospital were nearly 50 percent.…”
Section: Background On Civil War-era Procurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, with of the surviving wounded was likely to be amputees during the Civil War than during the Crimean War due to improvements in surgical survival rates. Estimates suggest amputation survival rates of roughly 75 percent during the U.S. Civil War (Figg and Farrell-Beck, 1993). During the years surrounding the Crimean War, by contrast, amputation survival rates among civilians treated in the relatively favorable conditions of the London Hospital were nearly 50 percent.…”
Section: Background On Civil War-era Procurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were practical, useful, they empowered their users and facilitated their return to some semblance of normality. There are broad similarities with the way that extremity prostheses were used by veterans in the US Civil War, and the First and Second World Wars, although the restorative effects of these on the individuals themselves and on their societies more broadly were made much more explicit in the way that the prostheses were marketed and advertised (Figg and Farrell-Beck, 1993;Hermes, 2002;Neumann, 2010;Hasegawa, 2012). However, facial prostheses seem to have been viewed relatively negatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown of the surviving wounded was likely to be amputees during the Civil War than during the Crimean War due to improvements in surgical survival rates. Estimates suggest amputation survival rates of roughly 75 percent during the U.S. Civil War (Figg and Farrell-Beck, 1993). During the years surrounding the Crimean War, by contrast, amputation survival rates among civilians treated in the relatively favorable conditions of the London Hospital were nearly 50 percent.…”
Section: Background On Civil War-era Procurementmentioning
confidence: 99%