1970
DOI: 10.3109/00016487009181862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amplitude of Evoked Responses to Tones of High Intensity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
32
1
1

Year Published

1975
1975
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
7
32
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, although it has been reported that these intensity growth functions can asymptote at higher intensity levels [Adler and Adler, 1989;Picton et al, 1970], we did not observe such a plateau in our data. This is likely due to the longer ISI used in the present study.…”
Section: Effect Of Intensitycontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, although it has been reported that these intensity growth functions can asymptote at higher intensity levels [Adler and Adler, 1989;Picton et al, 1970], we did not observe such a plateau in our data. This is likely due to the longer ISI used in the present study.…”
Section: Effect Of Intensitycontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…This is likely due to the longer ISI used in the present study. Picton et al [1970] found that intensity function asymptotes were only present at shorter ISIs.…”
Section: Effect Of Intensitymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may also be explained by the contamination by early components (N 1 , P 2 ), which seem to be differently sensitive to intensity changes. The N 1 amplitude increases with increasing stimulus intensity [Rapin et al, 1966;Beagley and Knight, 1967;Picton et al, 1970] which most likely affected the louder deviant comparisons. Further studies along these lines should therefore use descending intensity deviants to avoid this contamination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although AER amplitude generally increases with increasing stimulus intensity (AER 'augmenting'), individual differences in the degree of increment are prominent; many people actually show a decrease in amplitude with increasing stimulus intensity (AER 're ducing'). This has been found both in auditory [Picton et al, 1970] and visual AERs [Buchsbaum and P fefferba um , 1971; V a u g h a n and H u l l , 1965], Decreases in amplitude with increasing stimulus intensity appear related to central neural factors; they do not reflect only peripheral ad justment mechanisms [Buchsbaum and P fefferbaum, 1971; in press].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%