2003
DOI: 10.1134/1.1560380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amplitude modulation of underwater noise produced by seagoing vessels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such technologies, including the hydrophone Buoy (Stolkin et al, 2006) or the simplest and low‐cost Portable Noise Recorder System (Salloum et al, 2018), are able to detect, track, and classify vessels based on their noise signature (Fillinger et al, 2011; Simard et al, 2016; Pollara et al, 2017; yellow square in Figure 4). Such harmonic footprint is modulated by mechanical characteristics of the vessels (e.g., engine size, propellers cavitation; Kudryavtsev et al, 2003; Pollara et al, 2017), and as a result, a noise‐based classification of vessels can be conducted (Santos‐Domínguez et al, 2016). Moreover, the passive nature of AT and autonomous noise recorders provide a low‐cost monitoring strategy not only economically but also logistically, since these systems can cover the surveillance of several kilometres (detection distance could reach ~24 km in the open sea, Salloum et al, 2018).…”
Section: Sdg14 Target 6—preventing Illegal Unreported and Unregulated...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such technologies, including the hydrophone Buoy (Stolkin et al, 2006) or the simplest and low‐cost Portable Noise Recorder System (Salloum et al, 2018), are able to detect, track, and classify vessels based on their noise signature (Fillinger et al, 2011; Simard et al, 2016; Pollara et al, 2017; yellow square in Figure 4). Such harmonic footprint is modulated by mechanical characteristics of the vessels (e.g., engine size, propellers cavitation; Kudryavtsev et al, 2003; Pollara et al, 2017), and as a result, a noise‐based classification of vessels can be conducted (Santos‐Domínguez et al, 2016). Moreover, the passive nature of AT and autonomous noise recorders provide a low‐cost monitoring strategy not only economically but also logistically, since these systems can cover the surveillance of several kilometres (detection distance could reach ~24 km in the open sea, Salloum et al, 2018).…”
Section: Sdg14 Target 6—preventing Illegal Unreported and Unregulated...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By analyzing this modulation spectrum, valuable information such as the ship's propeller speed, number of blades on the ship can be obtained. These parameters are crucial for determining the physical characteristics of a stable ship [3,4]. Nevertheless, the data on the ship's radiated noise observed through sonar in the ocean waveguide encompasses not only details about different noise sources and the ship's operational conditions and physical characteristics, but is also influenced by the ocean waveguide factors [5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation of that modulation provides information on the ship, such as the shaft rotation frequency, that can be used for ship classification. The method for estimation of the envelope modulation is known as DEMON (Detection of Envelope Modulation on Noise) [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] and the earlier papers describing this method were published about 50 years ago [11]. The DEMON spectra were the basis for various algorithms of ship classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%