1971
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(71)90100-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amplitude et variabilité des réflexes monosynaptiques avant un mouvement volontaire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
1

Year Published

1975
1975
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this experiment performed on one subject who had at rest a large H' test reflex (4-2 mV, 24 % of Mmax), the different stimulations were randomly alternated. As previously described (Pierrot-Deseilligny et al 1971), the soleus H reflex (reference H, filled triangles) was inhibited (passing from 22 to 13 % of Mmax) before a pretibial flexor ramp contraction, but the H' test reflex (filled circles) was much more inhibited (passing from 24 to 4 % of Mmax), this difference being statistically significant (P < 001). Here also there was variation between the subjects' amount of reflex inhibition, but, in all eight subjects studied in this way, the H' test reflex was more inhibited than reference H, this difference being significant (P < 0 05) in all cases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this experiment performed on one subject who had at rest a large H' test reflex (4-2 mV, 24 % of Mmax), the different stimulations were randomly alternated. As previously described (Pierrot-Deseilligny et al 1971), the soleus H reflex (reference H, filled triangles) was inhibited (passing from 22 to 13 % of Mmax) before a pretibial flexor ramp contraction, but the H' test reflex (filled circles) was much more inhibited (passing from 24 to 4 % of Mmax), this difference being statistically significant (P < 001). Here also there was variation between the subjects' amount of reflex inhibition, but, in all eight subjects studied in this way, the H' test reflex was more inhibited than reference H, this difference being significant (P < 0 05) in all cases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Before eliminating these factors which could have modified the H' test and reference H reflexes differently, a more general cause of bias has to be considered. It is easy to alter an H reflex intentionally, when the different kinds of stimulation are regularly alternated, as in the experiment (Hoffmann, 1918) or before (Pierrot-Deseilligny, Lacert & Cathala, 1971) voluntary contraction of the pretibial flexors is well-known. This inhibition is probably due in part to the activation of reciprocal Ia inhibition (Tanaka, 1974), although presynaptic inhibition of soleus Ia fibres by the Ia discharge from pretibial flexors has also been postulated to contribute to it (Gottlieb, Agarwal & Stark, 1970;Pierrot-Deseilligny & Lacert, 1973).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whatever the supraspinal structures and spinal mechanisms causing the facilitation of monosynaptic reflexes, it seems highly likely that this facilitation is just one of a number of peripheral events which precede the agonist EMG activity, since the facilitation of agonist monosynaptic re flexes is closely followed by inhibition of antagonist motoneuron activity [11]. It is suggested that these events may represent the components of a 'priming' mechanism, similar to the process postulated by Lashley [7], which is responsible for presetting (that is, facilitating or inhibiting) the constituent muscles of a movement response prior to and for the duration of the response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facilitation of monosynaptic stretch reflexes has been demonstrated in the muscle concerned just prior to the onset of the overt motor response in a simple reaction time task [2,9,11]. This paper deals with possible functions of this facilitation in normal man and its relationship to central processing in a choice reaction time task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study this function in intact animals and in humans with both normal and pathological states, we still have to rely on general reflex tests of whole motor pools with mechanical stimuli (Requin 1969;Gottlieb et al 1970;Coquery and Coulmance 1971;Pierrot-Deseilligny et al 1971;Papakostopoulus and Cooper 1973;Gerilowsky et al 1983). Often the results of both mechanical and electrical reflex studies are interpreted qualitatively without much attempt to validate them against the prediction of a model of the neural network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%