2014
DOI: 10.1039/c3nj01614e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amplified impedimetric DNA sensor based on graphene oxide–phenylboronic acid for sensitive detection of bleomycins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are also in good agreement with the measurement by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS, see below), which is an effective method to investigate the interfacial properties of modied electrodes. 47,48 Signicant changes and homogeneous enhancement in the electrochemical impedance spectra of the TA/peptide bilayers modied electrode are observed as a function of the number of assembled bilayer (Fig. 4a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These results are also in good agreement with the measurement by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS, see below), which is an effective method to investigate the interfacial properties of modied electrodes. 47,48 Signicant changes and homogeneous enhancement in the electrochemical impedance spectra of the TA/peptide bilayers modied electrode are observed as a function of the number of assembled bilayer (Fig. 4a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This anchoring behavior induced the increase of the R ct value. The difficulty of electron transfer is mainly due to the electrostatic impulsion between the negatively charged phosphate groups of pre-hybridized DNA and negatively charged [Fe(CN) 6 ] 3-/4- [21]. The DNA substrate fragment subsequently breaking from the pre-hybridized DNA induced a further improvement in the R ct value in the aqueous solution containing Pb 2+ .…”
Section: Basic Characterization Of Nh 2 -Rgomentioning
confidence: 98%
“…DNA biosensors are powerful tools for cancer diagnosis and detection [ 1 ] and have been extensively developed by different methods including fluorescence [ 2 ], luminescence [ 3 ], surface plasma resonance spectroscopy [ 4 ] and electrochemistry [ 5 ]. In recent years, electrochemical DNA sensors have attracted increasing attention for their outstanding advantages such as inexpensive instrumentation, low detection limit and simplicity due to the ease of obtaining an electrical signal [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%