2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.xgen.2023.100297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amplification is the primary mode of gene-by-sex interaction in complex human traits

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2D). These results are in line with previous work suggesting that SPs, like other anthropometric traits, have clear differences in the magnitude of sex-specific effects when compared with other quantitative traits in the UKB ( 42 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2D). These results are in line with previous work suggesting that SPs, like other anthropometric traits, have clear differences in the magnitude of sex-specific effects when compared with other quantitative traits in the UKB ( 42 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…To test for pervasive differences in the magnitude of genetic effects, we performed sex-specific GWASs of all the skeletal traits and evaluated these polygenic scores in both sexes in a hold-out dataset ( 30 ). This method had recently been applied to examine sex-specific effects in biobank traits ( 42 ). Across all SPs that we tested, polygenic scores had a significantly larger standardized effect size (standardized in males and females separately) in males compared with females (Student’s t test p < 1 × 10 −3 for all comparisons) (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, both the additive and cis -interaction effects are simulated in the same way as previously described where, for the two groups of interacting variants, 10% of SNPs were selected to be in group #1 and we chose ±10 kb windows to assign SNPs to group #2. To create G × E effects, we follow a simulation strategy implemented by Zhu et al 65 and split our sample population in half to emulate two subsets of individuals coming from different environments. We randomly draw the effect sizes for the first environment from a standard Gaussian distribution which we denote as γ 1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These interact with the group #2 SNPs which are selected to be variants within a ± 100 kilobase (kb) window around each SNP in group #1. G × E effects were simulated using an amplification model 65 (see Materials and Methods) where we split the sample population in half to emulate two subsets of individuals coming from different environments. We randomly draw variant effect sizes for the first environment from a standard Gaussian distribution.…”
Section: Figures and Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the relative importance of different types of GxE (e.g., locus-specific GxE, genome-wide effects of E on genetic variance, genome-wide effects of E on both genetic and environmental variance) is currently unclear. Studies of GxSex interaction face similar challenges 1924 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%