2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2697(03)00465-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amplification efficiency of thermostable DNA polymerases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
93
3
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
8
93
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These values correspond to an increase in the frequency of 5′-CNaM from 18.71% to 24.65%, with the subpopulation having a 5′-GCNaM sequence increasing from 2.30% to 3.48%. These biases are not larger than the biases observed among natural sequences (39), and they are unlikely to interfere with any in vitro application of DNA containing the unnatural base pair, even including those applications requiring massive amplification.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These values correspond to an increase in the frequency of 5′-CNaM from 18.71% to 24.65%, with the subpopulation having a 5′-GCNaM sequence increasing from 2.30% to 3.48%. These biases are not larger than the biases observed among natural sequences (39), and they are unlikely to interfere with any in vitro application of DNA containing the unnatural base pair, even including those applications requiring massive amplification.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As SYBR Green intercalates nonspecifically into all double-stranded DNA molecules during the reaction, the assay must rely entirely on the PCR primers for specificity (21). In addition, the inhibition of the Taq DNA polymerase by SYBR Green could result in lower specificity (2). In our experiments, the annealing temperature was lowered in the reactions using SYBR Green compared with those using internal probes to counter this inhibition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,21,22 It has been noted that the GC content of DNA can significantly affect polymerase chain reaction amplification efficiency, sometimes causing premature chain termination at the beginning of G(C)-rich regions. [23][24][25][26] Although the exact mechanism of how GC content may affect DNA polymerase function is not well understood, it has been hypothesized that amplification of GC-rich templates can be hampered because of the formation of secondary structures such as hairpins and by higher melting temperatures, which can inhibit primer extension by DNA polymerases as well as enzyme processivity. 24,[27][28][29] These variables may also significantly affect the displacement of the complementary DNA strand in the branching reaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%