1982
DOI: 10.2307/1999515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ampleness and Connectedness in Complex G/P

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then k < t + m. For the Grassmannian, Gr (n, r), of the quotient C r 's of C n , t = r(n -r) -n + 1 and for the any smooth quadric t = 1 (see [5,7]). For the general formula see [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then k < t + m. For the Grassmannian, Gr (n, r), of the quotient C r 's of C n , t = r(n -r) -n + 1 and for the any smooth quadric t = 1 (see [5,7]). For the general formula see [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a whole literature on connectedness results (see [2]). In particular for general Y as above, Faltings [1] has a connectedness result that allows W to be singular; there is a discussion of this in [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.1 An important class of homogeneous vector bundles is provided by the tangent bundles of homogeneous projective manifolds G/P, where G is a semisirnple complex Lie group and P is a parabolic subgroup. The ampleness of such bundles was first worked out by Goldstein [5]. We now give a summary of his results to illustrate how the ampleness formula §2 can be applied.…”
Section: Tangent Bundlesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In §3 we review the results of Goldstein [5]. His calculation of the ampleness of the tangent bundle of X = G / P was one of the main inspirations for the generalization to arbitrary homogeneous vector bundles in this paper.…”
Section: On the Ampleness Of Homogeneous Vector Bundles By Dennis M mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…measures the failure of ampleness [5,7,9,21,22]. This leads to results that give π 1 -surjectivity if dim Y 1 +dim Y 2 is large enough.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%