2014
DOI: 10.1530/joe-13-0625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AMPK-derived peptides reduce blood glucose levels but lead to fat retention in the liver of obese mice

Abstract: AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a regulator of energy balance at both the cellular and the whole-body levels. Direct activation of AMPK has been highlighted as a potential novel, and possibly safer, alternative to treat type II diabetes and obesity. In this study, we aimed to design and characterize novel peptides that mimic the aG region of the a2 AMPK catalytic domain to modulate its activity by inhibiting interactions between AMPK domains or other interacting proteins. The derived peptides were teste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cause of the differential effect of hemin on AMPK phosphorylation depending on tissues is unclear in the present study, although the divergent regulation of AMPK has been reported previously. Novel peptides mimicking the a2 AMPK domain increase the AMPK phosphorylation in the skeletal muscle but not in the liver, which leads to reduced adipose tissue mass and triglyceride levels in the skeletal muscle and increased liver triglyceride levels (44). Furthermore, AMPK activity in skeletal muscle and liver is differentially regulated in lipodystrophic A-ZIP/F-1 mice, in which AMPK activity in the skeletal muscle of A-ZIP/F-1 mice is unchanged, while AMPK activity in liver is reduced (45).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cause of the differential effect of hemin on AMPK phosphorylation depending on tissues is unclear in the present study, although the divergent regulation of AMPK has been reported previously. Novel peptides mimicking the a2 AMPK domain increase the AMPK phosphorylation in the skeletal muscle but not in the liver, which leads to reduced adipose tissue mass and triglyceride levels in the skeletal muscle and increased liver triglyceride levels (44). Furthermore, AMPK activity in skeletal muscle and liver is differentially regulated in lipodystrophic A-ZIP/F-1 mice, in which AMPK activity in the skeletal muscle of A-ZIP/F-1 mice is unchanged, while AMPK activity in liver is reduced (45).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the strategy of targeting this binding site has already been followed with the computational design of peptides resembling the αG-helix of AMPK. 88 Surprisingly, instead of AMPK inactivation as might be expected from the mutant data, treatment with the peptides activated AMPK in myocyte and ameliorated metabolic parameters in high-fat fed mice. Whether the latter effect was really due to AMPK targeting was not studied, neither was the reason for AMPK activation.…”
Section: ■ Recent Insights Into Ampk Structure For Novel Targeting St...mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The αG-helix thus appears as a critical binding site for AMPK interactions. Interestingly, the strategy of targeting this binding site has already been followed with the computational design of peptides resembling the αG-helix of AMPK . Surprisingly, instead of AMPK inactivation as might be expected from the mutant data, treatment with the peptides activated AMPK in myocyte and ameliorated metabolic parameters in high-fat fed mice.…”
Section: Recent Insights Into Ampk Structure For Novel Targeting Stra...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peptides play a pivotal role in the regulation and modulation of the crowded protein network in the cell (Petsalaki and Russell, 2008) and may provide a starting point for drug discovery (Chapnik et al, 2014). Peptides as drug candidates have the potential to combine the advantages of small molecules such as cell permeability and cost-effectiveness with the high specificity of large biological compounds (Vlieghe et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%