2018
DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.748.22768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amphibians and reptiles of the state of Durango, Mexico, with comparisons with adjoining states

Abstract: A summary of the species of amphibians and reptiles of Durango, as well as their geographic distributions, habitat, and conservation status have been compiled. The herpetofauna of Durango consists of 36 species of amphibians and 120 species of reptiles. Durango shares the most species with Chihuahua (74.0%), and shares fewer species with Sinaloa (48.0%), Nayarit (48.7%), and Coahuila (48.0%). Arid-semiarid and Sierras habitat types have the most species, with valleys and Quebradas habitat types having fewer sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite its size, the data available concerning its herpetofauna is very scarce, thereby constituting an information gap about the species distributed in the region; Flores-Villela and García-Vázquez (2014) and Lemos-Espinal et al (2018) underlined the lack of studies and species lists of herpetofauna in Zacatecas. By contrast, neighboring states have complete works on their amphibians and reptiles, such as Aguascalientes: Vázquez-Díaz and Quintero-Díaz 2005; Coahuila: Lemos-Espinal and Smith 2016a; Durango: Valdez Lares et al 2013, Lemos-Espinal et al 2018a, Lemos-Espinal et al 2019Guanajuato: Elizalde-Arellano et al 2014;Jalisco: Chávez-Avila et al 2015;Nayarit: Luja et al 2014, Woolrich-Pina et al 2016Nuevo León: Lazcano-Villarreal 1997;Lazcano-Villarreal et al 2010;Lemos-Espinal et al 2016b;Lemos-Espinal et al 2018b;and San Luis Potosí: Lemos-Espinal et al 2018c. Another problem that Zacatecas faces is the lack of publications on regional or municipal studies with venomous snakes and herpetofauna in general. There are only specific notes recorded on the state rattlesnake species of the Crotalus genus such as C. aquilus (Carbajal-Márquez et al 2015a), C. basiliscus (Ahumada-Carrillo et al 2011; Carbajal-Márquez et al 2015b); C. polystictus (Campbell and Lamar 2004; Ahumada-Carrillo 2010), C. atrox, C. lepidus, C. molossus and C. scutulatus (Campbell and Lamar 2004), C. willardi (Klauber 1949).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite its size, the data available concerning its herpetofauna is very scarce, thereby constituting an information gap about the species distributed in the region; Flores-Villela and García-Vázquez (2014) and Lemos-Espinal et al (2018) underlined the lack of studies and species lists of herpetofauna in Zacatecas. By contrast, neighboring states have complete works on their amphibians and reptiles, such as Aguascalientes: Vázquez-Díaz and Quintero-Díaz 2005; Coahuila: Lemos-Espinal and Smith 2016a; Durango: Valdez Lares et al 2013, Lemos-Espinal et al 2018a, Lemos-Espinal et al 2019Guanajuato: Elizalde-Arellano et al 2014;Jalisco: Chávez-Avila et al 2015;Nayarit: Luja et al 2014, Woolrich-Pina et al 2016Nuevo León: Lazcano-Villarreal 1997;Lazcano-Villarreal et al 2010;Lemos-Espinal et al 2016b;Lemos-Espinal et al 2018b;and San Luis Potosí: Lemos-Espinal et al 2018c. Another problem that Zacatecas faces is the lack of publications on regional or municipal studies with venomous snakes and herpetofauna in general. There are only specific notes recorded on the state rattlesnake species of the Crotalus genus such as C. aquilus (Carbajal-Márquez et al 2015a), C. basiliscus (Ahumada-Carrillo et al 2011; Carbajal-Márquez et al 2015b); C. polystictus (Campbell and Lamar 2004; Ahumada-Carrillo 2010), C. atrox, C. lepidus, C. molossus and C. scutulatus (Campbell and Lamar 2004), C. willardi (Klauber 1949).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its size, the data available concerning its herpetofauna is very scarce, thereby constituting an information gap about the species distributed in the region; Flores-Villela and García-Vázquez (2014) and Lemos-Espinal et al (2018) underlined the lack of studies and species lists of herpetofauna in Zacatecas. By contrast, neighboring states have complete works on their amphibians and reptiles, such as Aguascalientes: Vázquez-Díaz and Quintero-Díaz 2005 ; Coahuila: Lemos-Espinal and Smith 2016a ; Durango: Valdez Lares et al 2013 , Lemos-Espinal et al 2018a , Lemos-Espinal et al 2019 ; Guanajuato: Elizalde-Arellano et al 2014; Jalisco: Chávez-Avila et al 2015 ; Nayarit: Luja et al 2014 , Woolrich-Pina et al 2016 ; Nuevo León: Lazcano-Villarreal 1997 ; Lazcano-Villarreal et al 2010 ; Lemos-Espinal et al 2016b ; Lemos-Espinal et al 2018b ; and San Luis Potosí: Lemos-Espinal et al 2018c .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results suggest that the herpetofauna, especially the reptiles, of Sonora is considered to be of relatively low conservation concern at a global scale, but there is much greater conservation concern at a national level. Indeed, more local assessments (SEMARNAT and EVS ) are based on information specific to Mexico and thus are more likely to reflect the conservation needs of the Sonoran herpetofauna (see Lemos-Espinal et al 2018a , b for a similar assessment for other Mexican states). There are several taxa that, based on their IUCN listing, SEMARNAT category or their EVS , are of conservation concern.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We determined the conservation status of each species from the IUCN Red List 2019-2 ( IUCN 2019 ), SEMARNAT (2010) , and Environmental Vulnerability Scores ( Wilson et al 2013a , b ; Johnson et al 2015 ). We determined the number of species found in Sinaloa that were shared with the four neighboring states using recent herpetofaunal check lists for Sonora ( Lemos-Espinal et al, 2019a ), Chihuahua ( Lemos-Espinal et al 2017 ), Durango ( Lemos-Espinal et al 2019b ), and Nayarit ( Woolrich-Piña et al 2016 ). We also included the Baja California Peninsula in this comparison, using Grismer (2002) and Hollingsworth et al (2015) as species lists, since it used to be contiguous with the states of Sinaloa and Sonora .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%