2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12549-010-0042-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amphibia of Enspel (Late Oligocene, Germany)

Abstract: Amphibia from the Late Oligocene (MP 28) locality Enspel, Germany are represented by two caudates: a hyperossified salamandrid Chelotriton paradoxus and an indeterminate salamandrid different from Chelotriton in proportions of vertebral column. Anurans are represented by two forms of the genus Palaeobatrachus, one of which is nearly as large as P. gigas (now synonymized with P. grandipes). Pelobates cf. decheni, represented in this locality by three nearly complete adult skeletons and a large number of tadpole… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…sanchizi, early-late Miocene of Hungary, Austria and Czech Republic (Venczel, 2004;Ivanov, 2008;Venczel and Hír, 2013;Böhme and Vasilyan, 2014); P. decheni Troschel, 1861, late Oligocene of Germany (Böhme et al, 1982;Roček and Wuttke, 2010); and P. praefuscus Khosatzky, 1985, early Pliocene of Moldavia (Khosatzky, 1985).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sanchizi, early-late Miocene of Hungary, Austria and Czech Republic (Venczel, 2004;Ivanov, 2008;Venczel and Hír, 2013;Böhme and Vasilyan, 2014); P. decheni Troschel, 1861, late Oligocene of Germany (Böhme et al, 1982;Roček and Wuttke, 2010); and P. praefuscus Khosatzky, 1985, early Pliocene of Moldavia (Khosatzky, 1985).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Palaeobatrachus cf. grandipes from Enspel, late Oligocene (Roček and Wuttke, 2010). P. occidentalis from the late Maastrichtian and early Paleocene of North America (Estes and Sanchíz, 1982;Gardner, 2008) is not used in comparison since its generic assignment is questioned (Roček, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…paradoxus , from the specimens from Enspel and the Randeck Maar traditionally referred to C . paradoxus [ 29 , 30 ], from “ Tylototriton primigenius ” [ 22 ], from both “ Chelotriton sp., type I” and “ Chelotriton sp., type II” [ 13 , 32 ], from tentatively referred material from Oberleichtersbach and Sandelzhausen (Germany) [ 19 , 39 ], and finally from C . robustus [ 17 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(The original box is not preserved.) Yet, we have been unable to find a mention of it in the literature, with one exception: the specimen was mentioned and referred to Chelotriton paradoxus , but neither described nor illustrated, on page 324 of [ 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%