2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.10.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amphetamine-induced locomotion, behavioral sensitization to amphetamine, and striatal D2 receptor function in rats with high or low spontaneous exploratory activity: Differences in the role of locus coeruleus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We have shown that these two groups display, respectively, high and low levels of anxiety in several other behavioural tests and respond differently to certain pharmacological manipulations. For example, treatment with the neurotoxin DSP-4 which is selective to the locus coeruleus noradrenergic projections had different effects on spontaneous, amphetamine-stimulated (Alttoa et al, 2005) and amphetamine-sensitized (Alttoa et al, 2007) behaviour in LE- and HE-rats. DSP-4 treatment also decreased the ex vivo 5-hydroxyindoleacedic acid levels in the nucleus accumbens and striatum in LE-rats only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have shown that these two groups display, respectively, high and low levels of anxiety in several other behavioural tests and respond differently to certain pharmacological manipulations. For example, treatment with the neurotoxin DSP-4 which is selective to the locus coeruleus noradrenergic projections had different effects on spontaneous, amphetamine-stimulated (Alttoa et al, 2005) and amphetamine-sensitized (Alttoa et al, 2007) behaviour in LE- and HE-rats. DSP-4 treatment also decreased the ex vivo 5-hydroxyindoleacedic acid levels in the nucleus accumbens and striatum in LE-rats only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However the exact role of the receptors in these processes require additional clarification and therefore different animal models are used [6][7][8]. There are available several methods for the characterization of receptor expression and transmitter accumulation levels in animals, but information about the state of signal transduction system of receptors of interest has remained scarce.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it has been shown that one important factor for the development of D 2 supersensitivity after 6-OHDA induced lesions of the striatal DA system is connected with increased activity of G proteins, which in turn is caused by decreased affinity of GDP [6]. Correlations between animal behavior and D 2 -specific signal transduction has also been found in the case of amphetamine-induced locomotion [7] and sucrose intake of O. Pulges Á A. Rinken (&) Institute of Organic and Bioorganic Chemistry, University of Tartu, Jakobi Str.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In contrast, several studies have described psychostimulant-induced changes that take place downstream from G-protein-coupled dopamine receptors (GPCRs). These changes include altered G-protein coupling (Alttoa et al, 2007, Bailey et al, 2008), hyperactivity of adenylyl cyclase (Borgkvist and Fisone, 2007), changes in phosphorylation cascades (Borgkvist and Fisone, 2007, Zhai et al, 2008), and altered function of GPCR-associated ion channels (Kobayashi et al, 2004). Therefore, studying changes in D1 and D2 receptor-driven G-protein signaling is central to understanding psychostimulant-induced neural adaptations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%