2001
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.21-16-05916.2001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amphetamine Distorts Stimulation-Dependent Dopamine Overflow: Effects on D2 Autoreceptors, Transporters, and Synaptic Vesicle Stores

Abstract: Amphetamine (AMPH) is known to raise extracellular dopamine (DA) levels by inducing stimulation-independent DA efflux via reverse transport through the DA transporter and by inhibiting DA re-uptake. In contrast, recent studies indicate that AMPH decreases stimulation-dependent vesicular DA release. One candidate mechanism for this effect is the AMPH-mediated redistribution of DA from vesicles to the cytosol. In addition, the inhibition of stimulation-dependent release may occur because of D2 autoreceptor activ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

18
216
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(238 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
18
216
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, MDPV and cocaine inhibit dopamine clearance in a manner consistent with the dopamine uptake blockers (John and Jones, 2007), but MPDV is more potent and efficacious (Figure 3c-f). As is typically observed in cyclic voltammetry experiments, uptake inhibition results in a large increase in the magnitude of evoked dopamine signal and a profound broadening of the dopamine decay curve (Schmitz et al, 2001). MDPV causes a much greater increase in the dopamine AUC response when compared with cocaine ( Figure 3e).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, MDPV and cocaine inhibit dopamine clearance in a manner consistent with the dopamine uptake blockers (John and Jones, 2007), but MPDV is more potent and efficacious (Figure 3c-f). As is typically observed in cyclic voltammetry experiments, uptake inhibition results in a large increase in the magnitude of evoked dopamine signal and a profound broadening of the dopamine decay curve (Schmitz et al, 2001). MDPV causes a much greater increase in the dopamine AUC response when compared with cocaine ( Figure 3e).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Owing to its high potency at DAT, MDPV may display a slow dissociation from the site (ie, persistent binding), thereby augmenting and extending its pharmacological effects. In fact, previous voltammetric studies have shown that high-affinity dopamine uptake blockers like nomifensine and GBR12909 produce marked inhibition of dopamine clearance that mirrors the effects of MDPV shown here (Bull et al, 1990;Schmitz et al, 2001). It also remains possible that MDPV interacts with nontransporter sites of action, which further enhance its effects on dopamine clearance, and this proposal warrants examination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…At the 7 week time point, evoked dopamine release was recorded in coronal brain slices (Schmitz et al, 2001). Striatal brain slices were cut on a vibratome at 250 m thickness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parasagittal brain slices were prepared as above. Amperometric detection of dopamine release was performed with methods similar to those described (7). Carbon fiber electrodes (WPI, Sarasota, FL; 10-m diameter)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%