1994
DOI: 10.1093/jat/18.6.331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amphetamine as an Artifact of Methamphetamine during Periodate Degradation of Interfering Ephedrine, Pseudoephedrine, and Phenylpropanolamine: An Improved Procedure for Accurate Quantitation of Amphetamines in Urine

Abstract: During periodate degradation of interfering ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine in the extraction of methamphetamine from urine, it was observed that a small amount of methamphetamine was demethylated to amphetamine. although all three interfering phenylpropanolamines could be degraded by periodate at pH 5.2 and above, this periodate-mediated transformation of methamphetamine to amphetamine was observed only at pH 9.1 and above. Therefore, to avoid this transformation, a pH of 6.2 was used for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concern in workplace urine drug-testing programs has centered around the ability of an assay method to differentiate methamphetamine and ephedrine because both have similar chromatographic and mass spectral properties and there was some evidence that large amounts of ephedrine would form methamphetamine under high injection-port temperatures when derivatized using 4-carboxyhexaflurobutryl chloride (25,26) or heptaflurobutyric anhydride (26). One report (27) suggested removing the offending ephedrine by a metaperiodate oxidation prior to GC-MS analysis, and this has been recommended in the workplace drug-testing programs (26), but the pH must be controlled to prevent amphetamine artifact when methamphetamine is present (28). This application has little value in a clinical toxicology situation where the identity of an co-hydroxyl phenylethylamine is important in establishing a differential diagnosis, guiding subsequent therapeutic intervention, and providing effective patient or caregiver counseling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concern in workplace urine drug-testing programs has centered around the ability of an assay method to differentiate methamphetamine and ephedrine because both have similar chromatographic and mass spectral properties and there was some evidence that large amounts of ephedrine would form methamphetamine under high injection-port temperatures when derivatized using 4-carboxyhexaflurobutryl chloride (25,26) or heptaflurobutyric anhydride (26). One report (27) suggested removing the offending ephedrine by a metaperiodate oxidation prior to GC-MS analysis, and this has been recommended in the workplace drug-testing programs (26), but the pH must be controlled to prevent amphetamine artifact when methamphetamine is present (28). This application has little value in a clinical toxicology situation where the identity of an co-hydroxyl phenylethylamine is important in establishing a differential diagnosis, guiding subsequent therapeutic intervention, and providing effective patient or caregiver counseling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%