“…The analytical performance of fMWCNT-PEI/GCE was compared with the published reports for PMZ detection (Table I). Although involving different transducers, and some of them based on different detection techniques (such as amperometry, 38 cyclic voltammetry, 53,54 and differential pulse voltammetry 33,37,39,55,56 ), and electrolytes (such as H 2 SO 4 , 38 phosphate, 37,39,40,[53][54][55]57 and acetate buffer 33 ) at a variety of pH, similar linear ranges were overall obtained for all the studies, including this work, with the exception of Alizadeh et al 53 These authors 53 developed the most sensitive but a much more complex transducer using a carbon paste electrode modified with molecularly imprinted polymer, which presents two 57 and being comparable with those reported for a GCE modified with reduced graphene oxide, 38 bare GCE 56 and a graphite powder-ionic liquid paste coated gold electrode. 54 The noted differences in DL values may be due to the diverse formulas used to calculate the DL, since several studies used the standard deviation of blank signal for DL determination, but also, they may be caused by the different calculated sensitivities.…”