2013
DOI: 10.1080/14620316.2013.11513001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ampelographic and genetic characterisation of ancestral grapevine (Vitis viniferaL.) accessions present in the Umbria Region (Central Italy)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two “Cornacchione” samples from Valnerina showed an SSR profile different from the Cornacchione reported in the paper of [ 8 ] about the ancestral germplasm of Umbria and turned out to correspond to Cannella Nera [ 30 ], sometimes listed with the synonym Panfinone, a rare black-berried variety counted in the V IVC [ 11 ] and lacking any other bibliographic information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two “Cornacchione” samples from Valnerina showed an SSR profile different from the Cornacchione reported in the paper of [ 8 ] about the ancestral germplasm of Umbria and turned out to correspond to Cannella Nera [ 30 ], sometimes listed with the synonym Panfinone, a rare black-berried variety counted in the V IVC [ 11 ] and lacking any other bibliographic information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As a matter of fact, several minor grapevine varieties (belonging to known genotypes or showing a unique fingerprinting) can easily be found in abandoned reforested land plots or in old vineyards, and some historical documents describe certain spontaneous vines varieties in wooded areas called “Viti vicciute” [ 7 ]. Moreover, there is evidence that several autochthonous varieties are still grown locally, although unnamed and neither identified nor described [ 8 ]. The real origins of the different grapevine varieties historically cultivated in Umbria are still unclear, and the presence of sparse wild vines (as Vitis vinifera L. subsp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second reason for the absence of local names could be the lack of interest of the winegrowers to individualize vines, tending to manage the vineyard as a polyclonal or multivarietal orchard, similar to other crops such as the ancestral quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa L.) [52,53]. After all, this was the style in, for example, some parts of Italy, where vineyards were purposely managed with multiple genotypes per plot [54][55][56]. Tis fnding of multivarietal vineyards, that we usually found in properties of small growers, can be considered as one of the most remarkable fndings of this study, a condition verifed in diferent valleys.…”
Section: Lack Of Naming Initiative Among the Criolla Growers In Chilementioning
confidence: 99%