2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference 2008
DOI: 10.1109/fie.2008.4720327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Plus Two’ Peer-Led Team Learning improves student success, retention, and timely graduation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because students’ performance in gateway STEM courses has been shown to be a leading factor in STEM retention (Maton, Hrabowski III, & Schmitt, 2000; Becvar, Saupe, Noveron, & Narayan, 2008; Haak, HilleRisLambers, Pitre, & Freeman, 2011), STREAMS sought to increase STEM retention by improving student performance in gateway courses. STREAMS’s approach emphasized inquiry-based, small-group, peer-cooperative learning (Graham, Frederick, Byars-Winston, Hunter, & Handelsman, 2013; Summers & Hrabrowski, 2006; Dweck, 1986; Light & Micari, 2013; Deslauriers, Schelew, & Wieman, 2011; Froyd, 2007; Arendale, 2005), making this learning a required component of all students’ experience in gateway courses which posed the “highest risk” of attrition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because students’ performance in gateway STEM courses has been shown to be a leading factor in STEM retention (Maton, Hrabowski III, & Schmitt, 2000; Becvar, Saupe, Noveron, & Narayan, 2008; Haak, HilleRisLambers, Pitre, & Freeman, 2011), STREAMS sought to increase STEM retention by improving student performance in gateway courses. STREAMS’s approach emphasized inquiry-based, small-group, peer-cooperative learning (Graham, Frederick, Byars-Winston, Hunter, & Handelsman, 2013; Summers & Hrabrowski, 2006; Dweck, 1986; Light & Micari, 2013; Deslauriers, Schelew, & Wieman, 2011; Froyd, 2007; Arendale, 2005), making this learning a required component of all students’ experience in gateway courses which posed the “highest risk” of attrition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a “Studio Physics” model, previously-distinct lecture and laboratory modalities were combined into a single approach. In two three-hour studio class meetings per week, instruction alternated between mini-lectures, group-based inquiry activities, and laboratory-style experiments (Becvar et al 2008). Peer leaders attended the studio classroom to assist students when working in groups on problems or labs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43−48 Specifically, participants have found PLTL to be socially engaging and intellectually stimulating, as well as a productive use of their time. 47 The model also enhances general communication skills 43 and has been linked to the development of students' CT. 36 "The largest untapped area for future research" related to PLTL has been identified as evaluating its impact on students' development of reasoning and CT skills. 24 This study is a part of the response to this need.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP), the year 2021 marks the 21 st anniversary of implementation of PLTL in chemistry (Becvar, 2012;Gosser & Roth, 1998). At UTEP, PLTL has dramatically improved grades in general chemistry, increased majors in chemistry and biochemistry, boosted retention rates, and led to improved graduation rates in STEM disciplines (Becvar et al, 2008;Darnell, et al, 2013;Dreyfuss, et al, 2015;Moreno, et al, 2013). In general, the fifty Peer Leaders in this robust program are consistently creating content and contributing to the program's growth and stability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%