2020 ASABE Annual International Virtual Meeting, July 13-15, 2020 2020
DOI: 10.13031/aim.202000952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<i>Development of a Machine Learning-based Assistance System for Computer-Aided Process Optimization within a Self-Propelled Sugar Beet Harvester</i>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, low resolution of the image, due to dry soil covering the camera lens during the harvesting, impacts on the performance of the developed models impacts, and the models are not able to extract enough features to perform accurate detection. Although the cleaning units were covered by a black tarpaulin sheet, the images were affected by sunlight during sunset and/or sunrise (Figure 9B), which has already been reported by [17] as an important parameter negatively affecting the quality of images in sugar beet harvesters. Furthermore, in this study the testing time of the detection models was computed and is shown in Figure 10.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, low resolution of the image, due to dry soil covering the camera lens during the harvesting, impacts on the performance of the developed models impacts, and the models are not able to extract enough features to perform accurate detection. Although the cleaning units were covered by a black tarpaulin sheet, the images were affected by sunlight during sunset and/or sunrise (Figure 9B), which has already been reported by [17] as an important parameter negatively affecting the quality of images in sugar beet harvesters. Furthermore, in this study the testing time of the detection models was computed and is shown in Figure 10.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…However, no studies have yet been reported for real-time detection of sugar beet mechanical damage during harvesting. Addressing the challenge of real-time monitoring of damages in harvesters is a key parameter in introducing advanced models into the design of automatic and optimized control system to improve the quality of the sugar beet during harvesting [17]. Hence, the aim of this study was to develop various CNN vision models, i.e., YOLO v4, Faster R-CNN and R-FCN for detection of sugar beet damage during harvesting using digital cameras installed in a sugar beet harvester.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, this is due to improper adjustment of the beet head cutter, incorrect adjustment of the depth and distance between the openers of the root crop grubber, incorrect displacement of the harvesting unit relative to the beet rows, the incorrectly selected rotation speed of the separating complex, conveyor, elevator, etc. [5,6]. A significant part of the losses can be avoided by installing adaptive devices based on computer vision systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computer-aided design approach merged mathematical algorithms and computational models to study complex system behaviors [15][16][17]. New strategies have been introduced where field data and simulation models are synergistically combined, an overall framework referred to as model-based system testing [18,19]. In 2017, Golpira and Golpira [20] merged conventional design methodologies with metaheuristic modeling combining genetic algorithms with fuzzy logic to develop a hybrid computational algorithm that predicted the optimal sizing of a grain harvester platform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%