2015
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b07904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amorphous to Tetragonal Zirconia Nanostructures and Evolution of Valence and Core Regions

Abstract: In this report, we study the evolution of valence band (VB) structure during a controlled amorphous to tetragonal transformation of ZrO2 core-shell nanostructures fabricated from electrospun nanofiber template (at 130, 200, and 250 °C). Shell-ZrO2 was formed with atomic layer deposition. X-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy are employed to unveil the transformation of amorphous to crystalline structure of ZrO2. O 1s core-level spectra indicated chemisorbed oxygen (OCh) of almost invariant fra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As reported in Figure S6B , the two VBM values (extrapolated by a linear fit in the descending side of the curve toward the Fermi Level at 0 eV) are: 1.53 eV for t-ZrO 2 and 1.72 eV for m-ZrO 2 , which also confirm the relative positions of the valence bands reported in the Figure 10 . This difference in the VBM, even if not so huge, represents a hint that the t-ZrO 2 is more conductive on its surface, electronically speaking, than the monoclinic one, as reported by Dash et al ( 2004 ) This behavior has also been observed in theoretical studies in which the electronic structure and density of states (DOS) of ZrO 2 polymorphs have been investigated by DFT or LCAO calculations (Zandiehnadem et al, 1988 ; Vempati et al, 2015 ; Sinhamahapatra et al, 2016 ). The main result is that both materials possess a flat valence band, which is in accordance with the semiconducting behavior, however, the t-ZrO 2 polymorph presents a higher amount of unoccupied states than m-ZrO 2 (at around 5 eV above the Fermi level) and the O deficiency creates new available states in the gap region (Dash et al, 2004 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As reported in Figure S6B , the two VBM values (extrapolated by a linear fit in the descending side of the curve toward the Fermi Level at 0 eV) are: 1.53 eV for t-ZrO 2 and 1.72 eV for m-ZrO 2 , which also confirm the relative positions of the valence bands reported in the Figure 10 . This difference in the VBM, even if not so huge, represents a hint that the t-ZrO 2 is more conductive on its surface, electronically speaking, than the monoclinic one, as reported by Dash et al ( 2004 ) This behavior has also been observed in theoretical studies in which the electronic structure and density of states (DOS) of ZrO 2 polymorphs have been investigated by DFT or LCAO calculations (Zandiehnadem et al, 1988 ; Vempati et al, 2015 ; Sinhamahapatra et al, 2016 ). The main result is that both materials possess a flat valence band, which is in accordance with the semiconducting behavior, however, the t-ZrO 2 polymorph presents a higher amount of unoccupied states than m-ZrO 2 (at around 5 eV above the Fermi level) and the O deficiency creates new available states in the gap region (Dash et al, 2004 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…This phenomenon has been observed for the water splitting reaction on commercial P25 TiO 2 with mixed anatase and rutile crystalline phases (Masolo et al, 2015 ), in which the creation of a heterostructure between the two polymorphs leads on an improved interface that allow a fast separation of the photogenerated charges with a consequent reduction of recombination processes. In the present case, although the band gap values of the various phases of ZrO 2 are quite similar (Dash et al, 2004 ), the VB and CB potentials of ZrO 2 polymorphs are different, as shown in Figure 10 , where a schematic representation of the relative VB and CB positions of m-ZrO 2 vs. the t-ZrO 2 and c-ZrO 2 were drawn considering the VBM experimentally obtained by XPS (Figures S6 ) and theoretical works (Zandiehnadem et al, 1988 ; Hernández et al, 2015 ; Vempati et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…[ 38 ] The O 1s spectrum was fitted with three peaks (Figure S12b, Supporting Information) corresponding to terminal hydroxyls, bridging hydroxyls, and physisorbed water. [ 39 ] Notably, Zr–O(H)–Zr species were the key components of NANMs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To control proper curation terms in MIACARM, we collected and assigned necessary IDs and technical and ontological terms from 13 existing collections: BioAssay Ontology [23]; Cell: Expression, Localization, Development, Anatomy [24]; Chemical Entities of Biological Interest Ontology [25]; Cell Ontology [26]; EDAM Bioinformatics Operations, Data Types, Formats, Identifiers, and Topics [27]; Experimental Factor Ontology [28]; Biological Imaging Methods Ontology [29]; Foundational Model of Anatomy [30]; Medical Subject Headings [31]; Microarray and Gene Expression Data Ontology [32]…”
Section: Ontology Assignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%