2008 5th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks 2008
DOI: 10.1109/sahcn.2008.63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amorphous Placement and Informed Diffusion for Timely Field Monitoring by Autonomous, Resource-Constrained, Mobile Sensors

Abstract: Abstract-Personal communication devices are increasingly equipped with sensors for passive monitoring of encounters and surroundings. We envision the emergence of services that enable a community of mobile users carrying such resource-limited devices to query such information at remote locations in the field in which they collectively roam. One approach to implement such a service is directed placement and retrieval (DPR), whereby readings/queries about a specific location are routed to a node responsible for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, before node p is updated, it would continue to deliver packets according to the old (obsolete) working schedule of node b, which could suffer significant greater packet loss than necessary. For example, as shown in Figure 11, node b reduces its duty-cycle by changing its working schedule from (3,6,9) to (6,9). Assuming predecessor node p has a packet ready at time 1, unaware of the new working schedule at node b, node p would try to deliver the packet with active instance sequence (3, 6, 9, 3, 6, 9, ...) until the packet is successfully delivered or the number of retransmissions reaches the bound R max .…”
Section: A Impact Of Schedule Updatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, before node p is updated, it would continue to deliver packets according to the old (obsolete) working schedule of node b, which could suffer significant greater packet loss than necessary. For example, as shown in Figure 11, node b reduces its duty-cycle by changing its working schedule from (3,6,9) to (6,9). Assuming predecessor node p has a packet ready at time 1, unaware of the new working schedule at node b, node p would try to deliver the packet with active instance sequence (3, 6, 9, 3, 6, 9, ...) until the packet is successfully delivered or the number of retransmissions reaches the bound R max .…”
Section: A Impact Of Schedule Updatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, an adjustment would add the augmented active instance to the previous schedule. Consequently, the new working schedule produced by the adjustment could be (3,6,8), where (3,6) are identical to the previous working schedule.…”
Section: B Shuffle-based Vs Adjustment-based Energy Synchronizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this work, a dynamic-programming algorithm is used to determine an optimal execution order of queries. Examples of other studies that proposed coordination strategies include techniques that ensure efficient storage, caching, and exchange of spatio-temporal data [6,7] or aggregates thereof [8]. In our work, we focus on reducing overheads by adding Data De-duplication functionality to a subset of nodes at various hierarchies, without concern to resource or energy constraints.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that work, a dynamic-programming algorithm is used to determine an optimal execution order of queries. Examples of other studies that proposed coordination strategies include techniques that ensure efficient storage, caching, and exchange of spatio-temporal data [22,23] or aggregates thereof [21].…”
Section: Centrality In Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%