2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.11.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amorphous nickel tungstate films prepared by SILAR method for electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the very beginning, the addition of an equivalent amount of sodium salt of the oxyanion (Na 2 MoO 4 ·2H 2 O for NiMoO 4 and Na 2 WO 4 ·2H 2 O for NiWO 4 ) to the nickel­(II) solution resulted in the formation of an amorphous NiXO 4 (where X = Mo and W) precipitate, which then transformed into nanostructured materials under hydrothermal conditions (Figure S1). Isolated NiXO 4 materials were then analyzed through powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD). Well-defined and sharp diffractions between a 2θ value of 20–80° corroborated the crystalline nature of both NiMoO 4 and NiWO 4 (Figure a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the very beginning, the addition of an equivalent amount of sodium salt of the oxyanion (Na 2 MoO 4 ·2H 2 O for NiMoO 4 and Na 2 WO 4 ·2H 2 O for NiWO 4 ) to the nickel­(II) solution resulted in the formation of an amorphous NiXO 4 (where X = Mo and W) precipitate, which then transformed into nanostructured materials under hydrothermal conditions (Figure S1). Isolated NiXO 4 materials were then analyzed through powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD). Well-defined and sharp diffractions between a 2θ value of 20–80° corroborated the crystalline nature of both NiMoO 4 and NiWO 4 (Figure a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44 ■ RESULTS AND DISCUSSION (Figure S1). 45 Isolated NiXO 4 materials were then analyzed through powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD). Well-defined and sharp diffractions between a 2θ value of 20−80°corroborated the crystalline nature of both NiMoO 4 and NiWO 4 (Figure 1a).…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 5 b, the Ni 7 FeO x (OH) y @NCA exhibits the smallest Tafel slope of 72 mV·dec −1 , which is much better than those of the FeO x (OH) y @NCA (145 mV·dec −1 ), NiO x (OH) y @NCA (210 mV·dec −1 ), Ni 7 FeO x (OH) y @CA (112 mV·dec −1 ), RuO 2 (102 mV·dec −1 ), and Ni 7 FeO x (OH) y (126 mV·dec −1 ) that the optimal Ni 7 FeO x (OH) y @NCA has the fastest OER kinetics. To further investigate the electrocatalytic performance of NiFeO x (OH) y @NCA, we have performed cyclic voltammetric (CV) measurements to determine the double-layer capacitances (C dl ), which is considered an effective evaluation method of the electronic catalytic surface area (ECSA) [ 42 ]. The CV curves of the resulting electrocatalysts at varying scan rates are shown in Figure S4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The polarization curves were measured at a scan rate of 1 mV s −1 in the potentials between +0.1 V and +0.75 versus Hg/HgO. The measured potentials were converted to the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) scale using the Nernst equation E RHE = E Hg / HgO + 0.059 × pH + E Hg / HgO 0 where E Hg / HgO is the potential measured versus Hg/HgO electrode, E RHE is the calculated potential values versus RHE, and E Hg / HgO 0 is the redox potential of Hg/HgO electrode (0.140 V ± 0.001 V) at 298 K. The overpotential ( η ) was calculated from the polarization curve at a current density of 100 mA cm −2 using the following equation [ 18 ] η @ 100 false( normalV false) = E RHE false( normalV false) 1.23 false( normalV false) …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where E Hg=HgO is the potential measured versus Hg/HgO electrode, E RHE is the calculated potential values versus RHE, and E 0 Hg=HgO is the redox potential of Hg/HgO electrode (0.140 V AE 0.001 V) at 298 K. The overpotential (η) was calculated from the polarization curve at a current density of 100 mA cm À2 using the following equation [18] η @100 ðVÞ ¼ E RHE ðVÞ À 1.23ðVÞ…”
Section: Electrochemical Characterizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%