“…Both pristine Ru and RuAl illustrated a distinct peak at 181 cm –1 (Figure c), attributed to the metallic Ru–Ru bond . Meanwhile, relatively weak Ru–O bond signals appeared at 266, 512, and 634 cm –1 , inferring a partial surface oxidation due to the high sensitivity of the Ru surface. ,, The Ru–Ru peak of RuAl exhibited a slight positive shift to 183 cm –1 , confirming a stronger reduction capacity caused by Al incorporation. In comparison, the Ru–Ru vibration became rather weak on the Ru (Al) Fe catalyst, suggesting a significant loss of crystallinity accompanied by defects and lattice distortions generated in the Ru matrix.…”