“…In conflict with these two stimulus-driven accounts, amodal completion seems not solely influenced by low-level stimulus configurations but also impacted by various high-level contextual cues, as demonstrated in several studies. These cues encompass factors such as lighting conditions ( Kim, Jeng, & Anderson, 2014 ), spatial context ( Rauschenberger, Peterson, Mosca, & Bruno, 2004 ), temporal context ( Plomp & van Leeuwen, 2006 ), task demands ( Lee & Vecera, 2005 ), and familiarity with material properties ( Gerbino & Zabai, 2003 ; Vrins, de Wit, & van Lier, 2009 ) and object shapes ( Hazenberg & van Lier, 2016 ; Yun, Hazenberg, & van Lier, 2018 ). Moreover, research has shown that explicit learning can influence the preferred completion for occlusion patterns, especially in cases where local and global cues conflict ( Hazenberg, Jongsma, Koning, & van Lier, 2014 ).…”