2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-465-0_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AMMOS Software: Method and Application

Abstract: Recent advances in computational sciences enabled extensive use of in silico methods in projects at the interface between chemistry and biology. Among them virtual ligand screening, a modern set of approaches, facilitates hit identification and lead optimization in drug discovery programs. Most of these approaches require the preparation of the libraries containing small organic molecules to be screened or a refinement of the virtual screening results. Here we present an overview of the open source AMMOS softw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following on the earlier work of Verdonk et al, where the reasons of docking failures were compared for fragments and small molecules, [105] Vass et al used Glide to further investigate factors affecting success rates for the placement of linked fragments in sequential fragment docking. [82,110] Using 129 protein-ligand complexes, they tested three sampling protocols [124] AMMOS www.mti.univ-paris-diderot.fr/en/downloads.html [216] AutoMap ligmap.sourceforge.net [142] Cell-Dock mmb.pcb.ub.es/~cpons/Cell-Dock [217] CovalentDock code.google.com/p/covalentdock [102] CRDOCK ub.cbm.uam.es [101] cudock code.google.com/p/cudock [218] DecoyFinder URVnutrigenomica-CTNS.github.com/DecoyFinder [219] DockoMatic sourceforge.net/projects/dockomatic [103] Dolina by request [13] eSimDock www.brylinski.org/esimdock [64] GalaxyDock galaxy.seoklab.org/softwares/galaxydock.html [4,5] FIPSDock by request [104] Fleksy www.cmbi.ru.nl/software/fleksy [21] MMPBSA.py ambermd.org [220] RDKit www.rdkit.org [221] RosettaLigand www.rosettacommons.org/software/ [7,144] S4MPLE infochim.u-strasbg.fr [50] VinaMPI cmb.ornl.gov/~sek/ [222] WaterDock sbcb.bioch.ox.ac.uk/waterdock [81] Servers, platforms, and web interfaces BSP-SLIM zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/BSP-SLIM [212] ChemBioServer bioserver-3.bioacademy.gr/Bioserver/ChemBioServer [223] CovalentDock Cloud docking.sce.ntu.edu.sg [224] FORECASTER fitted.ca [175] FTMap ftmap.bu.edu [225,226] FTSite ftsite.bu.edu [227] idTarget idtarget.rcas.sinica.edu.tw [228] pyDockWEB life.bsc.es/servlet/pydock [229] Robetta robe...…”
Section: Fragment Dockingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following on the earlier work of Verdonk et al, where the reasons of docking failures were compared for fragments and small molecules, [105] Vass et al used Glide to further investigate factors affecting success rates for the placement of linked fragments in sequential fragment docking. [82,110] Using 129 protein-ligand complexes, they tested three sampling protocols [124] AMMOS www.mti.univ-paris-diderot.fr/en/downloads.html [216] AutoMap ligmap.sourceforge.net [142] Cell-Dock mmb.pcb.ub.es/~cpons/Cell-Dock [217] CovalentDock code.google.com/p/covalentdock [102] CRDOCK ub.cbm.uam.es [101] cudock code.google.com/p/cudock [218] DecoyFinder URVnutrigenomica-CTNS.github.com/DecoyFinder [219] DockoMatic sourceforge.net/projects/dockomatic [103] Dolina by request [13] eSimDock www.brylinski.org/esimdock [64] GalaxyDock galaxy.seoklab.org/softwares/galaxydock.html [4,5] FIPSDock by request [104] Fleksy www.cmbi.ru.nl/software/fleksy [21] MMPBSA.py ambermd.org [220] RDKit www.rdkit.org [221] RosettaLigand www.rosettacommons.org/software/ [7,144] S4MPLE infochim.u-strasbg.fr [50] VinaMPI cmb.ornl.gov/~sek/ [222] WaterDock sbcb.bioch.ox.ac.uk/waterdock [81] Servers, platforms, and web interfaces BSP-SLIM zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/BSP-SLIM [212] ChemBioServer bioserver-3.bioacademy.gr/Bioserver/ChemBioServer [223] CovalentDock Cloud docking.sce.ntu.edu.sg [224] FORECASTER fitted.ca [175] FTMap ftmap.bu.edu [225,226] FTSite ftsite.bu.edu [227] idTarget idtarget.rcas.sinica.edu.tw [228] pyDockWEB life.bsc.es/servlet/pydock [229] Robetta robe...…”
Section: Fragment Dockingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure was followed by the addition of hydrogens and attribution of the 3D structure for each compound with the Standardizer[47] software. Geometries of the ligands were then optimized with the AMMOS [48] software implemented in the Mobyle portal. Afterwards, the library was submitted to the FAF-Drugs3 [5,6] server.…”
Section: Library Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%