Abstract:The reduction and recovery of nitrogen (N) from anaerobically digested manure (digestate) is desirable to mitigate N-related emissions, mainly ammonia and nitrate, derived from digestate land application in nutrient-saturated zones. This work reports the results of a gas-permeable membrane (GPM) pilot-scale plant to recover ammonia from digestate in the framework of the EU project Ammonia Trapping. The total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) concentration in digestate was reduced by 34.2% on average (range 9.4–57.4%). Th… Show more
“…Comparing the values obtained with those reported in the literature, the NH 3 capture efficiencies for sulfuric, phosphoric, and nitric acid obtained in this study were similar to those attained by other authors [40,45], and the differences may be attributed to the fact that the capture system was not the same. Riaño et al [50], using a submerged GPM system with a sulfuric acid capture solution, reported capture efficiencies of up to 79.7%; Zhang et al [45], using a CapAmm system, obtained NH 3 capture efficiencies of 75% for phosphoric acid and 73% for sulfuric acid; and Reig et al [40], using hollow fiber liquid-liquid membrane contactors (HF-LLMC) combined with ion exchange, attained NH 3 capture efficiencies of 74% and 85% with nitric and phosphoric acid, respectively.…”
Section: Differences In Nh 3 Flux Nh 3 -N Capture and Nh 3 -N Removal...mentioning
Gas permeable membranes (GPM) are a promising technology for the capture and recovery of ammonia (NH3). The work presented herein assessed the impact of the capture solution and temperature on NH3 recovery for suspended GPM systems, evaluating at a laboratory scale the performance of eight different trapping solutions (water and sulfuric, phosphoric, nitric, carbonic, carbonic, acetic, citric, and maleic acids) at 25 and 2 °C. At 25 °C, the highest NH3 capture efficiency was achieved using strong acids (87% and 77% for sulfuric and nitric acid, respectively), followed by citric and phosphoric acid (65%) and water (62%). However, a remarkable improvement was observed for phosphoric acid (+15%), citric acid (+16%), maleic acid (+22%), and water (+12%) when the capture solution was at 2 °C. The economic analysis showed that water would be the cheapest option at any working temperature, with costs of 2.13 and 2.52 €/g N (vs. 3.33 and 3.43 €/g N for sulfuric acid) in the winter and summer scenarios, respectively. As for phosphoric and citric acid, they could be promising NH3 trapping solutions in the winter months, with associated costs of 3.20 and 3.96 €/g N, respectively. Based on capture performance and economic and environmental considerations, the reported findings support that water, phosphoric acid, and citric acid can be viable alternatives to the strong acids commonly used as NH3 adsorbents in these systems.
“…Comparing the values obtained with those reported in the literature, the NH 3 capture efficiencies for sulfuric, phosphoric, and nitric acid obtained in this study were similar to those attained by other authors [40,45], and the differences may be attributed to the fact that the capture system was not the same. Riaño et al [50], using a submerged GPM system with a sulfuric acid capture solution, reported capture efficiencies of up to 79.7%; Zhang et al [45], using a CapAmm system, obtained NH 3 capture efficiencies of 75% for phosphoric acid and 73% for sulfuric acid; and Reig et al [40], using hollow fiber liquid-liquid membrane contactors (HF-LLMC) combined with ion exchange, attained NH 3 capture efficiencies of 74% and 85% with nitric and phosphoric acid, respectively.…”
Section: Differences In Nh 3 Flux Nh 3 -N Capture and Nh 3 -N Removal...mentioning
Gas permeable membranes (GPM) are a promising technology for the capture and recovery of ammonia (NH3). The work presented herein assessed the impact of the capture solution and temperature on NH3 recovery for suspended GPM systems, evaluating at a laboratory scale the performance of eight different trapping solutions (water and sulfuric, phosphoric, nitric, carbonic, carbonic, acetic, citric, and maleic acids) at 25 and 2 °C. At 25 °C, the highest NH3 capture efficiency was achieved using strong acids (87% and 77% for sulfuric and nitric acid, respectively), followed by citric and phosphoric acid (65%) and water (62%). However, a remarkable improvement was observed for phosphoric acid (+15%), citric acid (+16%), maleic acid (+22%), and water (+12%) when the capture solution was at 2 °C. The economic analysis showed that water would be the cheapest option at any working temperature, with costs of 2.13 and 2.52 €/g N (vs. 3.33 and 3.43 €/g N for sulfuric acid) in the winter and summer scenarios, respectively. As for phosphoric and citric acid, they could be promising NH3 trapping solutions in the winter months, with associated costs of 3.20 and 3.96 €/g N, respectively. Based on capture performance and economic and environmental considerations, the reported findings support that water, phosphoric acid, and citric acid can be viable alternatives to the strong acids commonly used as NH3 adsorbents in these systems.
“…Digestate samples from the vessels and acidic solution samples from the acid tank were collected daily to monitor pH and total ammonia nitrogen (TAN). In addition, initial and final samples from the digestate were taken to determine total solid (TS), volatile solid Experimental set-up of the gas-permeable membrane system, consisting of 1 a wastewater vessel, 2 a tubular membrane submerged in the wastewater, 3 a tank containing the acidic trapping solution, 4 a peristaltic pump that continuously recirculated the acidic solution through the tubular membrane, 5 an air pump to supply air to wastewater, and 6 an airflow meter to control the supplied airflow rate.…”
Section: Experimental Procedures For N Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For that, air stripping can present high requirements of energy and chemicals compared with the GPM technology. This technology has been successfully proved to recover NH 3 from digestate at pilot scale [3]. Now, the Life Green Ammonia aims at scaling results to the livestock sector market by means of commercial models.…”
Section: Agronomic Assessment Of the N Recovery Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, the recovery of N from wastewater could partially offset the demand for nitrogen-based fertilisers [2]. The effluents produced after anaerobic digestion of agro-industrial waste (digestate) are an important source of N. At the same time, decreasing the N content from anaerobic digestate can reduce the environmental risks associated with its use as fertiliser in nitrate-vulnerable zones [3]. The current technologies for N recovery include precipitation by struvite, ultrafiltration/ion exchange, ultrafiltration/reverse osmosis, or acid absorption following separation by gas stripping or gas-permeable membrane (GPM) technology [2,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1.Experimental set-up of the gas-permeable membrane system, consisting of 1 a wastewater vessel, 2 a tubular membrane submerged in the wastewater,3 a tank containing the acidic trapping solution,4 a peristaltic pump that continuously recirculated the acidic solution through the tubular membrane,5 an air pump to supply air to wastewater, and6 an airflow meter to control the supplied airflow rate.…”
The manufacture of mineral N fertilisers by the Haber–Bosch process is highly energy-consuming. The nutrient recovery technologies from wastes through low-cost processes will improve the sustainability of the agricultural systems. This work aimed to assess the suitability of the gas-permeable membrane (GPM) technology to recover N from an anaerobic digestate and test the agronomic behaviour of the ammonium sulphate solution (ASS) obtained. About 62% of the total ammonia nitrogen removed from digestate using GPM was recovered, producing an ASS with 14,889 ± 2324 mg N L−1, which was more than six-fold higher than in digestate. The ASS agronomic behaviour was evaluated by a pot experiment with triticale as a plant test for 34 days in a growth chamber. Compared with the triticale fertilised with the Hoagland solution (Hoag), the ASS provided significantly higher biomass production (+29% dry matter), N uptake (+22%), and higher N agronomic efficiency 3.80 compared with 1.81 mg DM mg−1N in Hoag, and a nitrogen fertiliser replacement value of 133%. These increases can be due to a biostimulant effect provided by the organic compounds of the ASS as assessed by the FT-Raman spectroscopy. The ASS can be considered a bio-based mineral N fertiliser with a biostimulant effect.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.