2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00147-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ammonia emission, deposition and impact assessment at the field scale: a case study of sub-grid spatial variability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
68
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…emissions, such that the modelled average concentration from a 5 km model grid cell may differ significantly from that measured at a specific location within the grid cell (Dragosits et al, 2002).…”
Section: Comparison Of Model With Measurements From National Monitorimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…emissions, such that the modelled average concentration from a 5 km model grid cell may differ significantly from that measured at a specific location within the grid cell (Dragosits et al, 2002).…”
Section: Comparison Of Model With Measurements From National Monitorimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sutton et al (1998) compared deposition estimates based on different scales, ranging from field to landscape to national scale and concluded that, due to the spatial variability of NH 3 , the quality of an environmental impact assessment is dependent on the spatial resolution of the deposition data used. Dragosits et al (2002) provide a more detailed analysis of the landscape study in Sutton et al (1998): Emission, transport and deposition were modelled within a 5 km x 5 km landscape in England at a 50 m grid resolution; however, no NH 3 measurements were made to verify the estimates. Theobald et al (2001) and Dragosits et al (2006) focused on strategies to reduce the effect of emission hotspots on ecosystems by locating tree belts around the sources, indicating the importance of relative spatial location of sources and sinks, and assessed possible landscape planning measures to decrease potential effects on sensitive habitats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For assessing the environmental impact of NH 3 concentrations and deposition by modelling, it is essential to estimate NH 3 emissions accurately (Dragosits et al, 2002;Hellsten et al, 2008). Hallsworth et al (2010) highlighted the problem of modelling NH 3 dispersion at relatively coarse scales, such as 5 km resolution, due to the high spatial variability of NH 3 emissions and showed that 5 km modelling underestimated the impact of NH 3 concentrations on semi-natural areas close to intensive agricultural areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four main categories of agricultural management activities can be identified as key sources of ammonia: emissions from housing, grazing, storage and manure spreading, and fertiliser use (Misselbrook et al, 2010). Ammonia emissions at the local scale vary greatly within the landscape and dry deposition of ammonia occurs especially close to sources (Hellsten et al, 2008;Dragosits et al, 2002). As a consequence, nitrogen sensitive ecosystems close to sources are at a high risk of negative impacts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%