The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2010
DOI: 10.1002/jmr.1053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amino acids–nucleotides biomolecular recognition: from biological occurrence to affinity chromatography

Abstract: aIn this review, the protein-DNA interactions are discussed considering different perspectives, and the biological occurrence of this interaction is explained at atomic level. The evaluation of the amino acid-nucleotide recognition has been investigated analysing datasets for predicting the association preferences and the geometry that favours the interaction.Based on this knowledge, an affinity chromatographic method was developed also exploiting this biological favoured contact. In fact, the implementation o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
3
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been many previous attempts to determine these relative affinities using crystallographic analyses (see, for example, Sousa et al 65 for a review), so the three data-sets that we have chosen (Table 4) only provide a representative comparison rather than a comprehensive one. It is clear, however, that in terms of the preferences exhibited by amino acid sidechains for the four DNA bases, there is little agreement with the existing data-sets (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been many previous attempts to determine these relative affinities using crystallographic analyses (see, for example, Sousa et al 65 for a review), so the three data-sets that we have chosen (Table 4) only provide a representative comparison rather than a comprehensive one. It is clear, however, that in terms of the preferences exhibited by amino acid sidechains for the four DNA bases, there is little agreement with the existing data-sets (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of affinity matrices with amino acids ligands was mainly supported by the natural occurrence of protein-DNA complexes in biological systems [18] and because some atomic evidences suggested the existence of favored interactions between particular amino acids and nucleic acids bases [19][20][21]. Recently, several amino acids, such as histidine [22,23] and arginine [24,25] have been tested as affinity ligands in agarose chromatographic supports to specifically purify sc pDNA from a clarified E. coli lysate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7–10 Most protein-DNA interactions involve the DNA backbone, and are not specific to a particular DNA sequence. 7,9 Arginine, a positively charged polar amino acid, contains a guanidinium group on its side-chain that readily interacts with the negatively charged DNA backbone. 7,9 Glutamate and aspartate, two negatively charged amino acids, form significantly fewer interactions with DNA than expected based on random docking, presumably due to unfavorable electrostatic interactions with the negatively charged phosphate backbone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,9 Positively charged amino acids covalently conjugated to chromatography resin have been used to purify plasmid DNA through a combination of ion exchange and affinity chromatography. 9,11 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%