2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amino acid isotopes in functional assemblages of Collembola reveal the influence of vertical resource heterogeneity and root energy supply on trophic interactions in soil food webs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bayesian mixing models as well as LDA bootstrapping identified fungi as the main source of eAAs for both Collembola and Oribatida across all elevations, while plants and bacteria were of low importance. Generally, our results are in line with earlier studies that identified fungi, mainly saprotrophic fungi, as major basal resources of both Collembola and Oribatida, especially in forest ecosystems (Li et al, 2022; Pollierer & Scheu, 2021). High amounts of oleic (18:1ω9) as well as linoleic acid (18:2ω6,9) in both taxa also point to fungi as the major basal resource.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bayesian mixing models as well as LDA bootstrapping identified fungi as the main source of eAAs for both Collembola and Oribatida across all elevations, while plants and bacteria were of low importance. Generally, our results are in line with earlier studies that identified fungi, mainly saprotrophic fungi, as major basal resources of both Collembola and Oribatida, especially in forest ecosystems (Li et al, 2022; Pollierer & Scheu, 2021). High amounts of oleic (18:1ω9) as well as linoleic acid (18:2ω6,9) in both taxa also point to fungi as the major basal resource.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, microbial stress, which likely compromises the production of microbial defensive compounds, may counteract the effects of low litter quality on microarthropod nutrition at higher elevations (Lux et al, 2022a). Since fungi form the major food resource for both Collembola and Oribatida (Li et al, 2022; Pollierer & Scheu, 2021), and fungi are the main decomposer microorganisms of low‐quality litter, the diet of microarthropods at higher elevations may shift toward more microbial food; however, shifts in trophic niches of microarthropods with elevation are little studied (Fischer et al, 2014; Maraun et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, Collembola have been shown to preferentially feed on fungi (Pollierer and Scheu 2021 ; Li et al 2022 ; Lux et al 2024 ). However, as indicated by results of our study, a large fraction of the (functional) Collembola community may also predominantly feed on litter and only switch to feeding on resources of higher trophic level if nutrient limitation increases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, direct contributions of the Collembola community to decomposition of litter might be higher at lower elevations, while Collembola may feed more intensively on the more abundant microbial resources at higher elevations. Collembola in forest ecosystems have been found to predominantly rely on saprotrophic fungi (Pollierer and Scheu 2021 ; Li et al 2022 ); consequently, the trophic positions of Collembola communities may increase with elevation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, it has been shown that microarthropods are more sensitive to root trenching than macroarthropods in temperate forests (Bluhm et al, 2021). Differences in the vertical distribution of soil fauna may be another factor determining the use of litter vs. root resources (Li et al, 2022;Potapov, 2022). In fact, root-derived resources have been found to be more important for soilthan for litter-dwelling springtails in coniferous forests (Potapov, Semenina, et al, 2016); however, this pattern may not uniformly apply and has not been investigated in tropical ecosystems (Fujii et al, 2016;Li et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%