2013
DOI: 10.1007/s40121-013-0012-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amikacin Pharmacokinetics During Continuous Veno-Venous Hemodialysis

Abstract: IntroductionLittle is known about the pharmacokinetics of amikacin during continuous renal replacement therapy.MethodsThis prospective observational study included patients admitted to an academic medical center who received amikacin therapy while on continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD) and had at least two serum sample concentrations measured after first-dose administration. First-order pharmacokinetic parameters, patient characteristics, and CVVHD parameters were recorded.ResultsFifteen patients were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultrafiltration rate: 1,900-3,250 ml/h 1 g q8h (Vossen et al, 2015) Dialysate rate: 2 L/h 1 g q8h (Vossen et al, 2015) Combined flow rate: 1,500-2,800 ml/h 1 g q8h (Vossen et al, 2015) Amikacin Ultrafiltration rate: 30 ml/kg/h 25 mg/kg q48h (Roger et al, 2016b) Exact dose cannot be predicted (Lam and Bauer, 2013) Combined flow rate: 30 ml/kg/h 25 mg/kg q48h (Roger et al,…”
Section: Doripenemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ultrafiltration rate: 1,900-3,250 ml/h 1 g q8h (Vossen et al, 2015) Dialysate rate: 2 L/h 1 g q8h (Vossen et al, 2015) Combined flow rate: 1,500-2,800 ml/h 1 g q8h (Vossen et al, 2015) Amikacin Ultrafiltration rate: 30 ml/kg/h 25 mg/kg q48h (Roger et al, 2016b) Exact dose cannot be predicted (Lam and Bauer, 2013) Combined flow rate: 30 ml/kg/h 25 mg/kg q48h (Roger et al,…”
Section: Doripenemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A strategy of an extended-interval high loading dose of amikacin (25 mg/kg every 48 h) associated with therapeutic drug monitoring should be the preferred approach for amikacin under CVVH and CVVHDF (30 ml/kg/h) (Roger et al, 2016b). Studies (Lam and Bauer, 2013) observed a wide range of C max and T 1/2 during CVVHD, and indicated that the exact amikacin dosing regimen cannot be accurately predicted based on the dialytic dose or other factors available at the bedside during CVVHD. Amikacin dose regimens should be individualized for each patient on CVVHD based on first-dose PK assessment.…”
Section: Amikacinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies with intensive care unit (ICU) patients undergoing CRRT, amikacin clearance varied from 0.53 to 5.34 liters/h, accounting for 40 to 89% of the total body clearance (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15). These studies also reported conflicting results on the correlation between drug clearance and CRRT settings (11,14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies also reported conflicting results on the correlation between drug clearance and CRRT settings (11,14). As a general rule, it is expected that the efficiency of drug removal would be higher in continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF; diffusive and convective technique) modalities than in continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH; convective technique) modalities (16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This specific population was characterized by a wide interindividual variability of pharmacokinetics parameters. On the one hand, the total volume of distribution in non-CRRT and CRRT patients was higher than most of the previously reported values in critically ill patients (Table 5) (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24). The increased distribution was mainly reflected in the central volume and probably related to the limited diffusion of amikacin in peritoneal tissue (25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%