2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2005.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AMICA, an astro-mapper for AMS

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible rebrightening is visible only in the IR, although a monotonic decay is not ruled out. A similar feature has been seen in the case of GRB 060206 (Monfardini et al 2006b). If real, it might indicate a second reverse shock emission, initiated by the 300-s flare.…”
Section: O N C L U S I O N Ssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A possible rebrightening is visible only in the IR, although a monotonic decay is not ruled out. A similar feature has been seen in the case of GRB 060206 (Monfardini et al 2006b). If real, it might indicate a second reverse shock emission, initiated by the 300-s flare.…”
Section: O N C L U S I O N Ssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The significance is low and a monotonic decay is not ruled out. On the other hand, it is worth to point out that a similar feature has been detected at larger significance in the brighter GRB 060206 (Monfardini et al 2006b), in which case the R and i light curves could not be fitted with identical functions. If real, the rebrightening in the i band may de due to a second reverse shock, possibly initiated by the collision of the 300 s of the X-ray flare into the external medium.…”
Section: Afterglow Modelmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Therefore, either version (5) of the former scenario, in which the X-ray and the optical afterglows are due to separate jet components, or the latter scenario are preferable for this event. A recent Swift burst, GRB 060206, showed a late-time steepening of the optical light curve, but no break in the X-ray light curve at the same time (Monfardini et al 2006), which also lends support to version (5) of the former scenario, in which the X-ray and the optical afterglows are due to separate jet components.…”
Section: Implications Of No Jet Break Feature In the X-ray Bandmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Therefore, a better understanding of high redshift cluster properties can only be achieved via high resolution tSZ observations [10]. The NIKA camera ( [9]), installed at the 30 m IRAM telescope in Pico Veleta, was a pioneer in this respect as will be shown in this paper. NIKA [9,11] was a dual band millimeter intensity and polarization camera operated at 150 and 260 GHz and installed permanently at the IRAM 30-m telescope from 2013 to 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The NIKA camera ( [9]), installed at the 30 m IRAM telescope in Pico Veleta, was a pioneer in this respect as will be shown in this paper. NIKA [9,11] was a dual band millimeter intensity and polarization camera operated at 150 and 260 GHz and installed permanently at the IRAM 30-m telescope from 2013 to 2015. The NIKA camera (see Figure 2) was made of two arrays of Kinetic Inductance Detectors (KIDs) cooled down to 100 mK via a 3 He- 4 He dilution cryostat and instrumented via a dedicated readout electronics [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%