2011
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.32.5209
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

American Society of Clinical Oncology Executive Summary of the Clinical Practice Guideline Update on the Role of Bone-Modifying Agents in Metastatic Breast Cancer

Abstract: Bone-modifying agent therapy is only recommended for patients with breast cancer with evidence of bone metastases; denosumab 120 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks, intravenous pamidronate 90 mg over no less than 2 hours, or zoledronic acid 4 mg over no less than 15 minutes every 3 to 4 weeks is recommended. There is insufficient evidence to demonstrate greater efficacy of one bone-modifying agent over another. In patients with a calculated serum creatinine clearance of more than 60 mg/min, no change in dosage, i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
206
0
9

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 298 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
206
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore ASCO guideline recommends continuing bone modifying agent until evidence of substantial decline in patient's performance status. We know that bone modifying agents also reduce time to first and subsequent SRE (Van Poznak et al, 2011). Therefore development of a SRE is not an indication to stop bone modifying agent.…”
Section: Clinical Use Of Bone Modifying Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore ASCO guideline recommends continuing bone modifying agent until evidence of substantial decline in patient's performance status. We know that bone modifying agents also reduce time to first and subsequent SRE (Van Poznak et al, 2011). Therefore development of a SRE is not an indication to stop bone modifying agent.…”
Section: Clinical Use Of Bone Modifying Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All approved bisphosphonates and denosumab are capable of decreasing bone pain caused by breast cancer bone metastasis to some degree. Different pain assessment tools and treatment protocols were used in clinical trial therefore to decide which one is better is not possible (Van Poznak et al, 2011). Current standard care for cancer pain must be applied to all patients with bone pain.…”
Section: Clinical Use Of Bone Modifying Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important approach for those patients who have been diagnosed with, or developed bone disease as part of their underlying cancer, is to offer bisphosphonate therapy to alter bone metabolism and control bone remoulding and hence, prevent further episodes of bone disease progression (Lacy et al., 2006; Morgan et al., 2012; van Poznak et al., 2011). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, patients in pivotal trials in advanced cancer settings were often not treated beyond 1 year (Rosen et al., 2003; Saad et al., 2004), and uncertainties remained over prolonged use of ZOL. Consequently, most treatment guidelines recommend the use of ZOL for at least 1 year with continuation at the physician's discretion (Hillner et al., 2003; Kyle et al., 2007; Lacy et al., 2006; van Poznak et al., 2011). In addition, increases in the incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) and renal impairment were reported in patients receiving ZOL for time periods longer than 2 years (Bamias et al., 2005; Oh et al., 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Osseous metastatic disease accounts for substantial morbidity, ranging from pain to debilitating complications such as pathologic fractures and spinal cord compression (3). In addition to local radiotherapy, bisphosphonates and denosumab have modest efficacy in reducing skeletal complications across cancer types, although these therapies have not to date been shown to prolong survival (4,5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%