2011
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.36.0354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update on the Use of Chemotherapy Sensitivity and Resistance Assays

Abstract: The use of CSRAs to select chemotherapeutic agents for individual patients is not recommended outside of the clinical trial setting. Oncologists should make chemotherapy treatment recommendations based on published reports of clinical trials and a patient's health status and treatment preferences. Because the in vitro analytic strategy has potential importance, participation in clinical trials evaluating these technologies remains a priority.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
131
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
131
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous attempts have been made to develop a personalized in vitro platform to predict treatment response in individual patients, but no method has presently gained clinical acceptance (1). Cell lines are not readily established for every individual patient, and although a higher take rate and early signs of predictive value have been reported for patient-derived xenograft models, the 6-8 mo required to gain sufficient material may prohibit its development as a clinical decision-making tool (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous attempts have been made to develop a personalized in vitro platform to predict treatment response in individual patients, but no method has presently gained clinical acceptance (1). Cell lines are not readily established for every individual patient, and although a higher take rate and early signs of predictive value have been reported for patient-derived xenograft models, the 6-8 mo required to gain sufficient material may prohibit its development as a clinical decision-making tool (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Нередко наблюдения по сопоставлению результатов in vitro и ex vivo были малочисленны, а если и име-ли представительную выборку, то не были аккуратно спланированы. Порой в них отсутствуют сведения о длительности безрецидивного и общего выжива-ния пациентов, его качестве, неблагоприятных по-бочных реакциях, а также не фигурируют «слепые» сравниваемые группы [15,37]. Отсюда проистекает известная сдержанность в общей оценке проблемы.…”
Section: результаты и обсуждениеunclassified
“…Отсюда проистекает известная сдержанность в общей оценке проблемы. В 2012 г. появился обширный системный обзор [15] членов рабочей группы Американской ассоциации клинической онкологии (American Society of Clinical Oncology -ASCO), посвященный критическому ана-лизу преимуществ, директированных существую-щими методами определения in vitro терапии перед групповой. Резюмирующая часть содержит форму-лировку: «использование химиотерапевтических пре-паратов для индивидуализации терапии пациентов не рекомендуется объективной реальностью» пока не будет проверено медицинской практикой.…”
Section: результаты и обсуждениеunclassified
“…Clinicians and investigators frequently compare the MiCK assay with previously published chemotherapy sensitivity and resistance assays (12)(13)(14). However, the MiCK assay is a novel analysis that differs from such previous technologies in substantial ways.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Mick Assay With Chemotherapy Sensitivity Amentioning
confidence: 99%