“…The use of castration as a sentencing modality in the United States has been controversial. Scholars have questioned the constitutionality of laws mandating chemically induced castration 1 (e.g., Beckman, 1997; Fitzgerald, 1990; Lombardo, 1997; Mancini & Mears, 2013; Scott & Holmberg, 2003), raising many legal and ethical issues surrounding these treatments (Beauregard & Lieb, 2011; del Busto & Harlow, 2011; Mancini, Barnes, & Mears, 2011; Scott & Holmberg, 2003; Tregilgas, 2010). One of the assumptions behind such laws is that through chemical or surgical treatment aimed at reducing testosterone levels, sex offenders’ sexual urges will be reduced thus reducing the risk of recidivism (American Psychiatric Association, 1999; Scott & Holmberg, 2003).…”