2015
DOI: 10.1080/14697688.2015.1068443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

American options under stochastic volatility: control variates, maturity randomization & multiscale asymptotics

Abstract: American options are actively traded worldwide on exchanges, thus making their accurate and efficient pricing an important problem. As most financial markets exhibit randomly varying volatility, in this paper we introduce an approximation of American option price under stochastic volatility models. We achieve this by using the maturity randomization method known as Canadization. The volatility process is characterized by fast and slow scale fluctuating factors. In particular, we study the case of an American p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compare for the first parameter set a kriging model with LHS design D that uses N = 10, 000 (and estimates option value at 16.06) relative to the LSMC model with N = 128, 000 (and estimates option value of 16.05). For the set of examples from [1] we observe that the space-filling design does not perform as well, which most likely is due to having the inefficient rectangular LHS domain X = [30, 50] × [−4, 1]. Still, the sequential design method wins handily.…”
Section: Scalability In State Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compare for the first parameter set a kriging model with LHS design D that uses N = 10, 000 (and estimates option value at 16.06) relative to the LSMC model with N = 128, 000 (and estimates option value of 16.05). For the set of examples from [1] we observe that the space-filling design does not perform as well, which most likely is due to having the inefficient rectangular LHS domain X = [30, 50] × [−4, 1]. Still, the sequential design method wins handily.…”
Section: Scalability In State Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We consider the asset Put h(t, x 1 , x 2 ) = e −rt (K − x 1 ) + ; exercise opportunities are spaced out by ∆t δt. Related experiments have been carried out in [35], and recently in [1]. Table 5 lists three different parameter sets.…”
Section: Scalability In State Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, one cannot interpret (X, V ) as an "augmented" finite-dimensional Markov process due to non-trivial correlations associated with FBM and hence a concrete solution of the related optimal stopping problem is very challenging. We stress even optimal stopping problems based on finite-dimensional "augmented" Markovian-type models (X, V ) (e.g CIR-type models driven by Brownian motion) are not easy to solve it (see e.g [31,1]). In practice, the volatility V is not directly observed so that it has to be approximated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The zero order term in this expansion corresponds to the classical Black-Scholes term, where the constant spot volatility is replaced by the long term average volatility. This technique has been extended to cover other volatility dynamics, including Heston volatility, in as well as for real options and optimal exercise timing in and Agarwal et al (2016). Recently, Barsotti and Pontier (2016) used the asymptotic approach to study the optimal capital structure in a Merton structural firm model with stochastic volatility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%