2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-35401-4_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

American Options

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, for any w ∈ W A , multiplying (17a) by w − U 0 (which does not change the inequality sign), taking integral over the domain Ω and subtracting the integral of (17b) from it, we obtain the variational formulation of ( 17) as [39,Chapter 12]…”
Section: American Option: Linear Complementary Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, for any w ∈ W A , multiplying (17a) by w − U 0 (which does not change the inequality sign), taking integral over the domain Ω and subtracting the integral of (17b) from it, we obtain the variational formulation of ( 17) as [39,Chapter 12]…”
Section: American Option: Linear Complementary Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PSOR method converges for symmetric positive definite matrices B [40]. The PSOR works also for non-symmetric but diagonally dominant matrices [39]. But the matrix B resulting from SIPG discretization is not diagonally dominant.…”
Section: American Option: Linear Complementary Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%