American Indians, American Justice

Deloria, Vine; Lytle, Clifford M.

doi:10.7560/738331

Cited by 185 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Federal statutes, such as the Indian Removal Act, 25 U.S.C. § 174 (1830) sought to remove Eastern Tribes from their territory and force them westward, often ending in the death of Native American individuals due to extremely harsh conditions and disease (Rauch 1950;Foreman 1974;Deloria and Lytle 1983). Furthermore, in 1831, the second of the Marshall cases, Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 30 U.S. (1831), was decided.…”

Section: Historical Federal Policies and Native American Lands: Late ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

History of Native American land and natural resource policy in the United States: impacts on the field of paleontology

Hensel

Olson²,

Monarrez³

et al. 2023

Paleobiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We highlight the historical and contemporary policies that govern paleontological research on federally recognized Native American lands. The United States has a long history of fossil dispossession from Indigenous Peoples, and federal policies surrounding the management of Native American lands (i.e., reservations), and the geological resources therein, have changed through time. These changes reflect shifting popular and political ideologies regarding Native American nations’ sovereignty and self-governance. As of 2022, the United States has a government-to-government relationship with federally recognized Tribal entities, but that has not always been the case. Historians have divided post-contact Native American federal policy into distinct eras: Colonial Times to 1820, Native American Removal and Reservation (1820–1887), Allotments and Attempted Assimilation (1887–1934), Reorganization and Preservation (1934–1953), Termination and Relocation (1953–1968), and Tribal Self-Determination (1968–present). Documentation of how the federal policies from each of these eras continue to impact current paleontological research is limited. We summarize major legislative actions, court cases, and historical events that have affected paleontological resource management in Native American territory. We use this historical context to identify federal policy gaps and highlight legal nuances associated with fossil collection and ownership, particularly given the importance of fossils to some Native Americans’ cultural patrimony. Finally, we explore how these gaps affect scientific research and highlight best practices for conducting paleontological research on vertebrate, invertebrate, and paleobotanical body and trace fossils using the CARE (Collective Benefit, Authority to Control, Responsibility, Ethics) Principles for Indigenous Data Governance (https://www.gida-global.org/care).

show abstract

Section: Historical Federal Policies and Native American Lands: Late ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

History of Native American land and natural resource policy in the United States: impacts on the field of paleontology

Hensel

Olson²,

Monarrez³

et al. 2023

Paleobiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Both are framed through ongoing and naturalised frameworks of a deficit model (Yellowhorse, 2018a(Yellowhorse, , 2018b. I argue that a fundamental instrument of settler-colonial violence underpinning these discourses was the doctrine of discovery (Deloria & Lytle, 1983). It sought to justify land theft and the removal of Indigenous people from their places of belonging.…”

Section: Covid-19 and The Rubrics Of Valuementioning

confidence: 99%

Disability and Indigenous resistance: mapping value politics during the time of COVID-19

Yellowhorse

2022

AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article is about value politics and Indigenous resistance in the time of COVID-19. The effects of the pandemic on our global community have fuelled rhetoric of productivity—advancing collective lamentations of losing our normal lives within wider socio-political dialogue. This article examines how global responses to the COVID-19 pandemic amplified the visibility of settler-colonial histories in union with capitalist discourses to form value politics that impact Indigenous and disabled communities. Mapping wider social dialogue through time, I focus on current economy-based solutions in the call to return to a social normal at the risk of disabled communities. Such global responses are premised on capitalist logics of productivity and ableism which continue to disproportionately impact marginalised communities. By mapping rubrics of value within two settler nation states—the United States and Aotearoa New Zealand—I offer another rubric of value predicated on Diné (Navajo) practices of relationship and resistance.

show abstract

“…Contact between Native Americans and Europeans has been described in six periods, beginning with an initial phase (1532–1828) in which European colonists believed that Indians were the “owners” of the new land and that their consent would be needed for this ownership to be transferred (Deloria & Lytle, 1983, as cited in Green, 1999). As the United States grew as a young country, the second phase (1828–1887) included removal and relocation of the Indians under the philosophy that “discovery” of Indian land implied ownership by non-Indians.…”

Section: Contextual Information About Major Racioethnic Groupsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Building diversity competence through historical and demographic knowledge: Helpful information for managers.

Hays–Thomas

2015

The Psychologist-Manager Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With increasing diversity of the workforce, knowledge of cultural backgrounds of employees should contribute to the diversity competency of managers. This article outlines several reasons why such information should contribute to diversity competence. It provides major demographic characteristics and historical highlights of U.S. Census-defined racioethnic groups; specific workplace issues relevant for various groups are discussed. The article concludes with several recommendations for effective diversity management based on these considerations.

show abstract

American Indians, American Justice

Cited by 185 publications

References 0 publications

History of Native American land and natural resource policy in the United States: impacts on the field of paleontology

History of Native American land and natural resource policy in the United States: impacts on the field of paleontology

Disability and Indigenous resistance: mapping value politics during the time of COVID-19

Building diversity competence through historical and demographic knowledge: Helpful information for managers.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About