2007
DOI: 10.1177/1052562906297075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

American Hegemony and Business Education in the Arab World

Abstract: To what extent is American business education “hegemonic” in the Arab world? To answer this, the authors examine whether Lebanese people exposed to American-style business education share the values implicit in their textbooks and teaching resources. Finding evidence for such values among Lebanese business students and working people alike, they argue that American business education is not only externally dominant; it is also internally hegemonic in its influences on local Arab values. The authors examine the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is an extensive literature on Americanization, broadly understood as the transfer to other countries of US management theories (Guillén, 1994), practices (Djelic, 1998), and even models of business education (Locke, 1988; Kipping et al, 2004). This trend has been studied not only in relation to Western Europe and Japan, but in other countries as well (Kipping et al, 2008; Neal & Finlay, 2008; Üsdiken, 1996). Although referring basically to management practices, Kudo, Kipping and Schröter (2008) have developed an interesting periodization of phases of American influence that can be applied to our two cases under study.…”
Section: Comparative Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an extensive literature on Americanization, broadly understood as the transfer to other countries of US management theories (Guillén, 1994), practices (Djelic, 1998), and even models of business education (Locke, 1988; Kipping et al, 2004). This trend has been studied not only in relation to Western Europe and Japan, but in other countries as well (Kipping et al, 2008; Neal & Finlay, 2008; Üsdiken, 1996). Although referring basically to management practices, Kudo, Kipping and Schröter (2008) have developed an interesting periodization of phases of American influence that can be applied to our two cases under study.…”
Section: Comparative Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By 'critically reflect' we mean to question the very processes of knowledge creation in order to better understand how personal, interpersonal, and contextual factors influence what is said and done, or not said and not done through the research and educational texts (Smith 2011). This brings us back to Neal and Finlay's (2008) assertion that meaningful learning only occurs when we enhance student ability to decipher discursive politics between the dominant perspective and their own localized perspectives. Therefore, the exploration of contextualized business ethics phenomena in a manner that is cognizant of the power dynamics of control and resistance and that is aware of the local-global business reality is fundamental for students and researchers to be able to engage in meaningful learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…During his incumbency, prominent parliamentary leaders systematically engaged in grand corruption schemes such as collecting a 20% fee for acquiring lucrative state contracts for friends or relatives (Safa, 2002). The absence of any meaningful political reforms in Lebanon over sixty years had embedded such corrupt practices into every aspect of Lebanese life (Khatib, 2002;Neal & Finlay, 2008;Sidani, Zbib, Ahmed, & Moussawer, 2006).…”
Section: Effective Corrupt Political Leadership In Lebanonmentioning
confidence: 98%