2015
DOI: 10.1080/0966369x.2014.991705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

American graffiti: deconstructing gendered communication patterns in bathroom stalls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our observation that women talk more about their feelings and emotions -for example, in relation to topics such as love affairs and marriage -corroborates Loewenstine, Ponticos, and Paludi's (1982) finding that female graffiti often contains "advice to the love-forlorn and [on] existential issues about life, marriage, and happiness" (p. 308). Similarly, our findings support studies by Dindia and Allen (1992), Goldsmith and Dun (1997), Green (2003), and Leong (2016) which revealed that female graffiti tends to disclose more personal information and express more emotion. They also support Trahan's (2011) claim that male graffiti is generally impassive and lacking in emotion when compared to female graffiti.…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarkssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our observation that women talk more about their feelings and emotions -for example, in relation to topics such as love affairs and marriage -corroborates Loewenstine, Ponticos, and Paludi's (1982) finding that female graffiti often contains "advice to the love-forlorn and [on] existential issues about life, marriage, and happiness" (p. 308). Similarly, our findings support studies by Dindia and Allen (1992), Goldsmith and Dun (1997), Green (2003), and Leong (2016) which revealed that female graffiti tends to disclose more personal information and express more emotion. They also support Trahan's (2011) claim that male graffiti is generally impassive and lacking in emotion when compared to female graffiti.…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarkssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Built environments are generally evaluated as less satisfying by women [68] due to design which fails to take into account the different and specific needs [69]. Even the vandalism on public bathrooms shows gender differences [70]. These differences in scale scores may affect some of the reported problematic uses of bathrooms by women [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yogan ve Johnson (2006) kadın ve erkek graffiticilerin çizim ve yazılarını karşılaştırmış, üretilen sanat eserinin miktarı, içeriği ve biçiminin cinsiyete göre farklarını incelemiştir. Green (2003) ve Leong (2016), kadın ve erkek tuvaletlerinde yer alan duvar yazılarının iletişim kalıplarındaki farklılıkları, ifade farklarını inceleyen çalışmalardır. Phua (2020) ile Heyd ve Karnatz (2020) graffiti ve toplumsal cinsiyet ilişkisini, graffitilerdeki cinsiyet temsilleri aracılığıyla incelemişlerdir.…”
Section: İlgili Alanyazınunclassified