2010
DOI: 10.1080/14650041003718325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

American Dual Containment in Asia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the degree of success of American foreign policy in Asia was less miraculous to that of the Marshall Plan in Europe. The form of the threat, as well as the sphere of the perceived danger, never embodied the degree of concerns tantamount to that of the Soviet Union and American allies in Western Europe, but rather the United States stressed the significance to contain China's development in the region (Kelly, 2010). Only when the threat of ideological alteration went into play later on in Vietnam, the US began to initially assert defensive mechanism as a response to the expansion of communist North Vietnam to the generally-liberal US-friendly South Vietnam.…”
Section: Containment In Southeast Asia: Mishaps and Repercussionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the degree of success of American foreign policy in Asia was less miraculous to that of the Marshall Plan in Europe. The form of the threat, as well as the sphere of the perceived danger, never embodied the degree of concerns tantamount to that of the Soviet Union and American allies in Western Europe, but rather the United States stressed the significance to contain China's development in the region (Kelly, 2010). Only when the threat of ideological alteration went into play later on in Vietnam, the US began to initially assert defensive mechanism as a response to the expansion of communist North Vietnam to the generally-liberal US-friendly South Vietnam.…”
Section: Containment In Southeast Asia: Mishaps and Repercussionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 19th and 20th centuries, the US and Britain, sometimes in tandem, sometimes at odds, mixed international economic hegemony with a security role of offshore balancing (Gilpin, 1981; Kindleberger, 1996; Layne, 2007). Together they defeated or contained various Eurasian revisionists for two centuries (Kelly, 2010). A Nuclear Peace too would fit here.…”
Section: Theory Of a Paxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using Power Transition theory, Kelly predicts that if the United States, along with its allies, were to balance the rise of China, it would reap enormous benefits from such a strategy as opposed to its more recent record of intervention (Kelly R., 2015). Other scholars argue for a more veiled approach to containment, and thus call for a soft balancing whereby the US strengthens its allies (Burgess, 2016).…”
Section: Emphasizing the United Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%