American college of rheumatology quality indicators for rheumatoid arthritis: Benchmarking, variability, and opportunities to improve quality of care using the electronic health record

Abstract

Objective. To measure how rheumatologists across our health system performed with the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) quality indicators (QIs) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and methotrexate (MTX) drug safety, and to develop opportunities for improvement.Methods. An electronic health record (EHR) review of 1,062 unique RA patients seen by 15 rheumatologists in a 1-year period was performed. Percentage of each QI met, reasons why the metric was not met, and performance of rheumatologists based on years of experience were evaluated. Results. The percentage met was high for QI-2 (RA disease-modifying antirheumatic drug use; 94%), QI-3 (intervention if RA worse; 85%), and QI-4 (MTX risks discussion; 87%). Percentage met was lower for QI-1 (RA core data set; 69%), QI-5 (MTX baseline studies; 41%), and QI-6 (MTX followup studies; 46%). QI-1 and QI-5 were low due to most physicians missing a single test, and QI-6 was low because of few physicians driving the percentage down. Better QI performance was seen in rheumatologists with <10 years versus >10 years of experience for QI-1 (90% versus 64%; odds ratio [OR] 4.21, P ‫؍‬ 0.004) and QI-3 (96% versus 82%; OR 4.47, P ‫؍‬ 0.019). EHR chart review for this population required 179.3 hours. Conclusion. Measurement allows us to better understand the quality of care that we deliver. In this systematic benchmarking of the ACR QIs in a large RA cohort, performance was excellent in RA treatment-related QIs. Significant variability was noted in RA and MTX monitoring measures, which can be addressed using process redesign techniques.

Quality of Nonpharmacological Care in the Community for People with Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis

“…Also, this study relied on patient self-reported data, which is an inherent limitation in most surveys examining chronic illnesses and treatment use. To address this limitation, a few recent studies have advocated for the use of electronic medical records to assess quality of care 31,32 . Finally, the percentage of English-speaking participants was higher than that of the British Columbia population 33 (71%, vs 96% in the survey) because the questionnaire was in English only.…”

Assessment of American College of Rheumatology–Endorsed Quality Indicators in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

“…7,13,14 On review of the literature, it appears as though adherence rates have improved since the concept of "treating to target" in RA was brought to the forefront by the International Treat to Target Initiative, published in 2010. 15,16 Adherence to QI 6 (treatment with a DMARD) was 90.6% in Ferucci and colleagues' 14 2010 study, 96% in Li and colleagues' 7 2013 study, and 99.4% in our present study.…”

Incentives in Rheumatology: the Potential Contribution of Physician Responses to Financial Incentives, Public Reporting, and Treatment Guidelines to Health Care Sustainability

“…In a study of the performance of physicians in a large integrated health delivery system in the USA, there was evidence of variability across quality-of-care measures [30]. For six quality indicators, performance rates were reported as high (85-94 %) for three indicators and low for the remaining three (41-69 %).…”