American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM): A Professional Association in Service to Industry

Abstract

The American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM) is a professional association that represents the interests of its company-employed physician members. Fifty years ago the ACOEM began to assert itself in the legislative arena as an advocate of limited regulation and enforcement of occupational health and safety standards and laws, and environmental protection. Today the ACOEM provides a legitimizing professional association for company doctors, and continues to provide a vehicle to advance the agendas of their corporate sponsors. Company doctors in ACOEM recently blocked attempts to have the organization take a stand on global warming. Company doctors employed by the petrochemical industry even blocked the ACOEM from taking a position on particulate air pollution. Industry money and influence pervade every aspect of occupational and environmental medicine. The controlling influence of industry over the ACOEM physicians should cease. The conflict of interests inherent in the practice of occupational and environmental medicine is not resolved by the ineffectual efforts of the ACOEM to establish a pretentious code of conduct. The conflicted interests within the ACOEM have become too deeply embedded to be resolved by merely a self-governing code of conduct. The specialty practice of occupational and environmental medicine has the opportunity and obligation to join the public health movement. If it does, the ACOEM will have no further purpose as it exists, and specialists in occupational and environmental medicine will meet with and be represented by public health associations. This paper chronicles the history of occupational medicine and industry physicians as influenced and even controlled by corporate leaders.

Career Paths in Occupational Medicine

“…The data complement other surveys and expert opinion reports about the field. [8][9][10][11] Has the Field Changed?…”

Ethics, morality, and conflicting interests: how questionable professional integrity in some scientists supports global corporate influence in public health

“…Corporate influences extend also to traffic and transport regulations, threshold limit values for the classification of hazardous substances, hazardous materials bans, and surveillance of at-risk or harmed workers. [4][5][6] 4. Misleading reporting and misrepresentation of tobacco industry-sponsored research on public health regulations: Tobacco company funded studies supporting the development of ''reduced-harm'' cigarettes.…”

“…trying to change the status quo weaken or eliminate regulatory protections), risk assessments, and public, environmental, and occupational health policy-makers. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Professional ethics and personal integrity, in addition to specialized competence, are vital to ensuring sound scientific research. However, conflicting interests may affect the ethics and morality of scientists engaging in such work.…”

War on Carcinogens: Industry Disputes Human Relevance of Chemicals Causing Cancer in Laboratory Animals Based on Unproven Hypotheses, Using Kidney Tumors as an Example

“…The toxicology, risk assessment, and public health communities must demand the elimination of bias and conflicts of interest by publishers, journals, and professional organizations that virtually control the flow of scientific information. 11,[36][37][38][39][40][41] …”