2018
DOI: 10.4324/9780429494208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

American Architecture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice of the Gothic style – prescribed by a Royal Commission and realised by Charles Barry and Augustus Pugin – was, at one level, a practical design solution as it allowed for the incorporation of surviving medieval structures. At another level however, perpendicular gothic ‘was viewed by the mid-nineteenth-century Englishman as inherently … English … and because of the long association of Parliament with the medieval palace of Westminster the Gothic style was viewed as being connected with the parliamentary form of government’ (Roth and Roth Clark, 2014: 510). When completed and ‘towering over the modest brick-built Georgian terraces of Westminster, the new Palace had an enormous effect on the imagination of the Victorian public’ (UK Parliament, 2015a).…”
Section: ‘Symbolic Intent’ and Parliamentary Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of the Gothic style – prescribed by a Royal Commission and realised by Charles Barry and Augustus Pugin – was, at one level, a practical design solution as it allowed for the incorporation of surviving medieval structures. At another level however, perpendicular gothic ‘was viewed by the mid-nineteenth-century Englishman as inherently … English … and because of the long association of Parliament with the medieval palace of Westminster the Gothic style was viewed as being connected with the parliamentary form of government’ (Roth and Roth Clark, 2014: 510). When completed and ‘towering over the modest brick-built Georgian terraces of Westminster, the new Palace had an enormous effect on the imagination of the Victorian public’ (UK Parliament, 2015a).…”
Section: ‘Symbolic Intent’ and Parliamentary Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%